Laserfiche WebLink
Level of Service Descriptions <br />Level of <br />Description of Operation <br />Range of <br />Service <br />/C Ratios <br />Free flow. Individual users are virtually unaffected by the presence of others in the traffic <br />A <br />stream. Freedom to select desired speeds and to maneuver within the traffic stream is <br />0.00 — 0.60 <br />extremely high. The general level of comfort and convenience provided to the motorist, <br />passenger, or pedestrian is excellent. <br />Stable flow. The presence of other users in the traffic stream begins to be noticeable. <br />Freedom to select desired speeds is relatively unaffected, but there is a slight decline in the <br />B <br />freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream from LOS A. The general level of comfort <br />0.61 — 0.70 <br />and convenience provided is somewhat less than that of LOS A, because the presence of <br />others in the traffic stream begins to affect individual behavior. <br />Stable flow. This LOS marks the beginning of the range of flow in which the operation of <br />individual users becomes significantly affected by interactions with others in the traffic <br />C <br />stream. The selection of speed is affected by the presence of others, and maneuvering within <br />0.71 — 0.80 <br />the traffic stream requires substantial vigilance on the part of the user. The general level of <br />comfort and convenience declines noticeably at this level. <br />High density, but stable flow. Speed and freedom to maneuver are severely restricted, and <br />D <br />the driver or pedestrian experiences a generally poor level of comfort and convenience. <br />0.81 — 0.90 <br />Small increases in traffic flow will generally cause operational problems at this level. <br />Operating conditions at or near the capacity level. All speeds are reduced to a low but <br />relatively uniform value. Freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream is extremely <br />difficult, and generally accomplished by forcing a vehicle of pedestrian to "give way" to <br />E <br />accommodate such maneuvers. Comfort and convenience levels are extremely poor, and <br />0.91 — 1.00 <br />drivers or pedestrian frustration is generally high. Operations at this level are usually <br />unstable because small increases in flow or minor variations within the stream will cause a <br />breakdown. <br />Forced or breakdown flow. This condition exists wherever the amount of traffic approaching <br />F <br />a point exceeds the amount which can traverse that point. Queues form up behind such <br />> 1.00 <br />locations as arrival flow exceeds discharge flow. <br />ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS (PROJECT SPECIFIC) <br />• Evaluate the potential driveway entrance congestion going into the lot from "X ROAD". The <br />southeast parking lot, on the corner of "Y ROAD" and "X ROAD", can possibly cause an <br />obstruction in the entrance to the lot. Vehicles parked in the southeast parking lot, especially those <br />in accessible (ADA) parking near the entrance that are backing out of their parking space can <br />prevent vehicles from entering the parking lot. As a result, other vehicles behind will be held back <br />thus creating a traffic jam. This may cause an overflow of vehicles in the parking lot entrance, <br />leading to vehicles being backed up all the way to the "X ROAD" entrance as well. <br />• Vehicles that are exiting the lot making a left onto "X ROAD" can potentially be hazardous. <br />Having a raised medium on "X ROAD" will restrict vehicles from making that left turn out of the <br />lot. In result, there will need to be a path identified for those vehicles exiting the lot to head <br />eastbound. <br />3 <br />