My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75B
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
08/18/2020
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2020 1:13:53 PM
Creation date
8/17/2020 8:14:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
8/18/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
308
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the impacts of housing cost and economic uncertainty. As an example, according to the City's local <br />data, <br />70 percent of Santa Ana renters are low and very low-income renters. While the city has seen <br />increased production of affordable housing there has been a larger increase of above moderate <br />housing with the city's 2,409 RHNA above moderate allocation being exceeded by 2,677% per the <br />City's RHNA progress reports submitted to the state. With average rents of $2000 - $4000, none of <br />these above market rent units are affordable to most of Santa Ana's working families. <br />The need will be much greater as the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated needs that were already <br />existing in our communities. Housing costs in Santa Ana have been out of reach and will continue <br />to be out of reach in this current economic climate. Households that live in the 92701 zip code, the <br />city's most affordable zip code, must earn $35.68 an hour to afford two -bedroom housing. (National <br />Low Income Housing Coalition's "Out ofReach: The High Cast ofHousing in 2020"Report) The <br />proposed amendments further incentivize housing units with market rate rents that are not affordable <br />to the majority of the City's residents. The proposed amendments do not address the city's needs and <br />create further inequity for the city's residents with the greatest housing need. <br />As such, we oppose the following amendments to the Housing Opportunity Ordinance and <br />Affordable Housing Funds Policies and Procedures: <br />Housing Opportunity Ordinance - Sec. 41-1904. — Options to satisfy Inclusionary <br />requirements <br />- (c)(1) The proposed amendment reduces the in -lieu fee from $15 to $5 <br />The city must retain a $15 in -lieu fee and secure this funding source for much needed <br />affordable housing. The city risks losing state and federal housing matching funds by <br />lowering the in -lieu fee, at a time we face economic uncertainty as a result of the pandemic. <br />- (c)(2)(ii) The proposed amendments allow for Entitled Residential Projects to pay a <br />reduced fee of $10 per square foot as an incentive to obtain building permits during the <br />current economic climate. <br />Santa Ana residents are those that are most affected by the current economic climate. The <br />entitled projects in the pipeline would generate well over $30 million in in -lieu fees that is <br />needed urgently to create new affordable housing. Providing this incentive until April 20201 <br />may result in a loss of 1/3 of the in -lieu fees expected to be collected, or over $10 million <br />dollars, that would be used to build much needed affordable housing in the city. <br />Housing Opportunity Ordinance - Sec. 41-1909. - Inclusionary Housing Fund <br />- (a)(1)The proposed amendment allows for the use of inclusionary housing for'... <br />one-time programs for code enforcement, and quality of life, and general health and <br />safety activities' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.