CORRESPONDENCE - 75B - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Housing remains a critical issue in California with the situation growing more serious with each passing day. Studies show that the State needs over 180,000 new units each year and at best we are producing 80,000. This has caused a cascading spike in home prices across the region. With this ever-growing deficit, we need to have an honest conversation about Inclusionary Zoning Policies. In total, such policies restrain housing production, increase ownership costs and further complicate attainability for the majority of the region. In a study by Benjamin Powell, Ph.D. and Edward Stringham, Ph.D., titled, Housing Supply and Affordability: Do Affordable Housing Mandates Work?, the authors discovered that in the 45 cities where data was available, new housing production drastically decreased by an average of 31% within one year of adopting inclusionary housing policies. Additionally, the study suggests that inclusionary housing polices can increase new housing costs by $22,000 to $44,000, with higher priced markets increasing by $100,000. r Supporting these conclusions is a recent report from the Legislative Analyst's Office titled Perspectives on Helping Low -Income Californians Afford Housing. In this report, it states that "aitemntingto address the state's affordability challenges primarily throughexpansion of government programs would he impractical." Further, that "extending housing assistance to low-income Californians who currently do not receive it — either though subsidies for affordable units or housing vouchers — would require an annual funding commitment in the lo-w ten- of billions of dollars. As such, it finds that "many housing programs — vouchers, rent control, and inclusionary horsing — attempt to make housing, more affordable without increasing [ 1iiiSCiSI R[3ifRSSi�iiT3� 7ITITM,M1 1 i , The fact of the matter is seemingly clear in the City of Santa Ana. At the June 2, 2020 City Council meeting, city staff stated that during the period of 2016 — 2019, the time period immediately following the 2015 increase of the HOO fee, 2900 units were approved by the City, yet not one permit has been pulled to trigger paying the higher fee. To make matters worse, the entire globe has been thrust into the middle of a pandemic. Residents around the Country, especially in California, are being asked to self -quarantine and by extension, limit their access to work. The economic impact of this pandemic will take years to fully comprehend. Yet contained in the staff report, city staff paint a stark picture to this effect, detailing not just the delays in development activity on approved projects, but the overall damage to housing construction and how it may harm Santa Ana's local economy. That is why we are asking that "Entitled Residential Projects" be treated like any other planned or proposed residential project, and also be given the option of the staff proposed $5.00 per square foot in -lieu fee. Residential projects that have been approved by the city have most likely spent years in the entitlement process, spending significant capital in the hopes of building in the City of Santa Ana. If a proposed incentive based economic stimulus policy is to encourage much t Powell, Benjamin, Ph.D. and Stringham, Edward, Ph.D. Housing Supply and Affordability: Do Affordable Housing Mandates Work? Reason Public Policy Institute. April2004.