Laserfiche WebLink
<br />75B - I'm in opposition to the revision of the Housing Opportunity Ordinance as it is written. My understanding <br />of the proposals indicate that these revisions will remove the applicability of an affordable housing requirement <br />for all development projects within existing specific plans, specific developments, and overlay zones. <br /> <br />If this is the wish of the council, then you should be able to publicly defend the idea that the Main Place <br />Specific Plan should not include nor financially contribute to the affordable housing fund. That will be the <br />direct result of your decision. <br /> <br />85B - I'm supportive of the idea of granting an extension for the collection of signatures. The <br />unusual circumstances around the coronavirus pandemic significantly delayed the collection of signatures. If <br />only because this extension would further encourage the participation of residents in the democratic process. I <br />realize that this is not a proposal that the members of the Council are supportive of, but I hope that your faith in <br />the democratic process outweighs your reservation of the specifics of the proposal that is gathering <br />signatures. <br /> <br /> <br />Stay golden, <br /> <br />Manny <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />-- <br />Manuel J. Escamilla <br /> <br />https://www.escamillaforsantaana.org/ <br /> <br />Master of Urban and Regional Planning | Design and Development, 2018 <br />UCLA | Luskin School of Public Affairs | Department of Urban Planning <br />Master of Library and Information Science | Archival Studies, 2014 <br />UCLA | Graduate School of Education | Department of Information Science <br />Mobile 714.585.5523 Facebook MannyForSA Instagram Full_Metal_Archivist <br />Podcast Puro_Policy_Pari <br />2 <br />