My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 22B
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
08/18/2020
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 22B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2020 1:01:21 PM
Creation date
8/17/2020 10:50:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
8/18/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Flores, Dora <br />From:Kelly Kraus-Lee <kellyakraus@gmail.com> <br />Sent:Tuesday, August 18, 2020 1:15 PM <br />To:Pulido, Miguel; Sarmiento, Vicente; Penaloza, David; Solorio, Jose; Bacerra, Phil; <br />Villegas, Juan; Mendoza, Nelida; eComment <br />Subject:Public Comment AGAINST 22B <br />Dear Members of the Council, <br /> <br />I am a resident of Santa Ana (Ward 6 on the new map). I am against item 22B. SAPD does not need another <br />militarized vehicle. I reviewed the RFP for the FY19 DHS UASI grant money (link below). The RFP states that <br />the priority areas are: <br />1. emerging threats, including cybersecurity <br />2. lifelines (defined as an indispensable service that is critical to human health and safety). <br />Some of the suggested areas for funding under lifelines include food, water, sheltering; health and medical; <br />communications; and energy. <br /> <br />We are in a pandemic that is hitting our city harder than anywhere else in the county, during a record-setting <br />heat wave leading to rolling blackouts, all while students in our city are starting their first week of school at <br />home, online. Are these not emerging threats? Do these not require lifelines? How about we use the $353,653 <br />from DHS to invest in energy, medical supplies, and communications needs, as suggested in the RFP? I'm sure <br />the program officer would be happy to re-visit the proposal and make some amendments to our line items. <br /> <br />https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/1555008381091- <br />144e7470ec5e1958d6ad5e103c0825ad/FY_2019_HSGP_NOFO_FINAL_508.pdf <br /> <br />Kelly Kraus-Lee <br />3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.