My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE- 75B_Received by Planning Commission
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
08/18/2020
>
CORRESPONDENCE- 75B_Received by Planning Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2020 3:35:25 PM
Creation date
8/17/2020 3:24:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
8/18/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
For these reasons that we oppose the following amendments to the Housing Opportunity <br />Ordinance: <br />Sec. 41-1904. — Options to satisfy Inclusionary requirements <br />(c)(1) The proposed amendment reduces the in -lieu fee from $15 to $5 <br />The city must retain a $15 in -lieu fee and secure this funding source for much needed <br />affordable housing. The city risks losing state and federal housing matching funds by <br />lowering the in -lieu fee, at a time we face economic uncertainty as a result of the pandemic. <br />- (c)(2)(ii) The proposed amendments allow for Entitled Residential Projects to pay a <br />reduced fee of $10 per square foot as an incentive to obtain building permits during the <br />current economic climate. <br />Santa Ana residents are those that are most affected by the current economic climate. The <br />entitled projects in the pipeline would generate well over $30 million in in -lieu fees that is <br />needed urgently to create new affordable housing. Providing this incentive until April 20201 <br />may result in a loss of 3 3 % of the in -lieu fees expected to be collected, or over $10 million <br />dollars, that would be used to build much needed affordable housing in the city. <br />Sec. 41-1909. - Inclusionary Housing Fund <br />- (a)(1)The proposed amendment allows for the use of inclusionary housing for `... one- <br />time programs for code enforcement, and quality of life, and general health and safety <br />activities' <br />The creation of new affordable housing for Santa Ana residents needs to continue to be a <br />priority to address the critical housing shortage for lower income working families. <br />Affordable housing monies should not be diverted to fund code enforcement and health and <br />public safety programs that are funded from the City's budget. The City should not deplete <br />the Inclusionary Housing Fund's limited funds for these programs. Such an amendment goes <br />against the purpose of the HOO. Since its inception the HOO has been clear in its language <br />and purpose in that it states "Monies deposited into the inclusionary housing fund must be <br />used to increase and improve the supply of housing affordable to moderate, low, very low, <br />and extremely low income housings in the city... " (Sec. 41-1909. (a)(1)). <br />We urge you to vote against the proposed amendments to the Housing Opportunity Ordinance. <br />The proposed amendments are inconsistent with the intent of the ordinance and do not advance <br />its goals. <br />'44't <br />Penelope L pez <br />Organizing Director <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.