My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE- 75B_Received by Planning Commission
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
08/18/2020
>
CORRESPONDENCE- 75B_Received by Planning Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2020 3:35:25 PM
Creation date
8/17/2020 3:24:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
8/18/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
From: <br />Pat Coleman <br />To: <br />eComment <br />Subject: <br />AGAINST ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2020-03 <br />Date: <br />Monday, August 03, 2020 5:01:02 PM <br />Dear Planning Commissioners, <br />As a 31 year resident of Santa Ana, I am disappointed in the attempt to use the COVID crisis <br />to pass through what appears to be a developers' wish list. Once again, Santa Ana is selling <br />itself short and putting aside its needs and dignity in a fire sale peddled with the fear that we <br />won't be able to attract development into the city. We are a wonderful city full of young, <br />talented people in the heart of Orange County. <br />Currently, it is being noted that one of the few economic bright spots during COVID has been <br />real estate, perhaps not rentals, but it is hard to find a home for sale. Developers will be fine, <br />they just may need to shift gears. We do not need to subsidize them on the backs of our <br />community members who are struggling financially. <br />Sincerely, <br />Patricia Coleman <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.