My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-065 - Adopting Environmental Findings of Fact
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2020
>
2020-065 - Adopting Environmental Findings of Fact
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2020 3:04:10 PM
Creation date
8/20/2020 3:02:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Doc #
2020-065
Date
8/20/2020
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Warner Redhill Mixed -Use Project CEQA Findings of Fact <br />SECTION VII <br />RESOLUTION REGARDING ALTERNATIVES <br />The City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it has considered and rejected as infeasible the <br />alternatives identified in the EIR and described below. Section 15126.6 of the State CEQA <br />Guidelines requires an EIR to describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the Project, or to the <br />location of the Project, which could feasibly achieve most of its basic objectives, but would avoid <br />or substantially lessen any of the significant effects identified in the EIR analysis. An EIR is not <br />required to consider every conceivable alternative to a proposed project. Rather, an EIR must <br />consider a reasonable range of alternatives that are potentially feasible; an EIR is not required <br />to consider alternatives that are infeasible. In addition, an EIR should evaluate the comparative <br />merits of the alternatives. Therefore, this section sets forth the potential alternatives to the Project <br />analyzed in the EIR and evaluates them in light of the objectives of the Project, as required by <br />CEQA. <br />Objectives <br />The following objectives have been identified in order to aid decision makers in their review of <br />the proposed Project and its associated environmental impacts. <br />• Develop a mixed -use Project that constructs new multi -family residential units, which would <br />help meet the region's demand for housing. <br />• Transform an underutilized site with an economically viable development consistent with <br />other regional redevelopment in the Tustin Legacy Specific Plan and Irvine Business <br />Complex (IBC) and combines residential uses with community -serving retail near <br />employment opportunities, freeway access, and transit. <br />• Redevelop existing land uses that would utilize existing infrastructure, including: water, <br />sewer, arterial roadways, transit, and freeways; and provide non -vehicular (pedestrian <br />and bicycle) circulation. <br />• Develop a mix of housing to assist the City in meeting its jobs/housing balance. <br />• Provide onsite uses that reduce vehicular miles traveled (VMT) by providing an internal <br />pedestrian circulation system that links residential uses, recreation areas, and <br />retail/commercial areas onsite. <br />• Implement the SCAG Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy <br />(RTP/SCS) Land Use Policies related to population and housing by providing additional <br />housing near employment centers. <br />Alternatives <br />Key provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines relating to the alternatives analysis (Section <br />15126.6 et seq.) are summarized below: <br />• The discussion of alternatives shall focus on alternatives to the Project or its location that <br />are capable of avoiding or substantially lessening any significant effects of the Project, <br />City of Santa Ana 57 <br />May 2020 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.