My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-065 - Adopting Environmental Findings of Fact
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2020
>
2020-065 - Adopting Environmental Findings of Fact
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2020 3:04:10 PM
Creation date
8/20/2020 3:02:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Doc #
2020-065
Date
8/20/2020
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Warner Redhill Mixed -Use Project CEQA Findings of Fact <br />Vill. STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS <br />Introduction <br />The City of Santa Ana is the Lead Agency under CEQA for preparation, review and certification <br />of the EIR for The Warner Redhill Mixed -Use Project (Project). As the Lead Agency, the City is <br />also responsible for determining the potential environmental impacts of the proposed action and <br />which of those impacts are significant, and which can be mitigated through imposition of mitigation <br />measures to avoid or minimize those impacts to a level of less than significant. CEQA then requires <br />the Lead Agency to balance the benefits of a proposed action against its significant unavoidable <br />adverse environmental impacts in determining whether or not to approve the proposed Project. In <br />making this determination the City is guided by CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, Statement of <br />Overriding Considerations, which states: <br />(a) CEQA requires the decision -making agency to balance, as applicable, the economic, <br />legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposed project against its <br />unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve the project. If the <br />specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposal (sic) project <br />outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental <br />effects may be considered "acceptable." <br />(b) When the lead agency approves a project which will result in the occurrence of significant <br />effects which are identified in the final EIR but are not avoided or substantially lessened, <br />the agency shall state in writing the specific reasons to support its action based on the <br />final EIR and/or other information in the record. The statement of overriding considerations <br />shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. <br />(c) If an agency makes a statement of overriding considerations, the statement should be <br />included in the record of the project approval and should be mentioned in the notice of <br />determination. This statement does not substitute for, and shall be in addition to, findings <br />required pursuant to Section 15091. <br />In addition, Public Resources Code Section 21081(b) requires that where a public agency finds <br />that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations <br />for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the <br />mitigation measures or alternatives identified in an EIR and thereby leave significant unavoidable <br />effects, the public agency must also find that overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or <br />other benefits of the project outweigh the significant effects of the project. <br />Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(b) and the State CEQA Guidelines Section <br />15093, the City has balanced the benefits of the proposed Project against the unavoidable <br />adverse impacts associated with the Project and has adopted all feasible mitigation measures <br />with respect to these impacts. The City also has examined alternatives to the proposed Project, <br />none of which both meet the Project objectives and is environmentally preferable to the proposed <br />Project for the reasons discussed in the Findings and Facts in Support of Findings. <br />The City of Santa Ana, as the Lead Agency for this Project, and having reviewed the EIR for the <br />Warner Redhill Mixed -Use Project, and reviewed all written materials within the City's public <br />record and heard all oral testimony presented at public hearings, adopts this Statement of <br />Overriding Considerations, which has balanced the benefits of the Project against its significant <br />unavoidable adverse environmental impacts in reaching its decision to approve the Project. <br />City of Santa Ana <br />May 2020 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.