My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - NON-AGENDA
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
09/01/2020
>
CORRESPONDENCE - NON-AGENDA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2020 10:57:06 AM
Creation date
8/31/2020 10:50:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
9/1/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
R. Leonard, C.S.R, Inc. <br />Certified Shorthand Reporters <br />818.995.2449 <br />SHEET 29 PAGE 113 PAGE 115 <br />09:15:13 1 Q IS THERE ANYTHING IN EXHIBIT 5 THAT LED YOU TO 09:45:13 1 A NO. <br />2 BELIEVE MR. DALESANDRD WAS PR@4ISING THAT HE WOULD BE 09:45:13 2 Q DID YOU CONTINUE TO WORK WITH MR. DALESANDRD <br />3 SUCCESSFUL IN OBTAINING FINANCING FOR THE ROYAL CANYON 3 AFTER HE WAS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN THE ROYAL CANYON PROJECT? <br />4 PROJECT? 09:45:13 4 A YES. <br />D9:45:13 5 MR. BISNO: OBJECTION TO THE EXTENT THAT IT CAUSES 09:45:13 5 Q WHY? <br />6 YOU TO REVEAL THE CONTENT OF ATTORNEY -CLIENT 09:45:13 6 A AT THAT TI14E HE SOUNDED AS IF HE WAS SOMEBODY <br />7 COMMUNICATION, 7 WHO UNDERSTOOD REAL ESTATE, HAD CERTAIN AMOUNT OF <br />09:45:13 8 THE WITNESS: I WOULD SAY YES. ON PAGE 3 HE 09:45:13 E CONNECTIONS. HE CERTAINLY REPRESENTED THAT. HE SPEAKS <br />09:45:13 9 DISCUSSES A SUCCESS FEE SO I ASSUME I INFERRED THAT HE 9 IN SUCH A MANNER THAT AT THAT TIME I BELIEVED HE WOULD <br />10 WOULD HAVE SUCCESS IN REACHING HIS OBJECTIVE OF GETTING 10 BE ABLE TO BE SUCCESSFUL, <br />11 MY COMPANY CAPITAL TO DO THE PROJECT WE WERE SEEKING TO 09:45:13 11 THEN AS TIME WENT ON HE REVEALED THAT HE HAD NO <br />12 DO. 12 MONEY, NEEDED LOANS TO STAY IN THE CITY, AND I STARTED <br />D9:45:13 13 Q BY MR, RUBINER: OTHER THAN MR. DALESANDRD, DID 13 TO FEEL, WELL, I'M FORTUNATE ENOUGH TO HAVE A FEW <br />14 YOU EVER HIRE A CONSULTANT FOR ONE OF YOUR COMPANIES 14 DOLLARS. I'LL GIVE HIM A CHANCE TO SEE DESPITE NOT <br />15 BEFORE? 15 BEING SUCCESSFUL ON THESE TWO VENTURES, SEE IF HE CAN <br />09:45:13 16 A YES. 16 DIG SOMETHING ELSE UP, <br />09:45:13 17 Q AND HAD THE CONSULTANTS YOU HIRED FOR YOUR 09:45:13 17 I HAD NOT REALIZED THAT HE WAS OF THE NATURE HE <br />18 COMPANIES, HAD YOU EVER HIRED A CONSULTANT FOR THE 16 IS UNTIL LATER ON DOWN THE ROAD. <br />19 PURPOSE QF OBTAINING A LOAN FOR ONE OF YOUR COMPANIES? 09:45:13 19 Q WHEN YOU SAY 'OF THE NATURE HE IS,' WHAT DOES <br />09:45:13 20 A YES. 20 THAT MEAN? <br />09:45:13 21 Q AND HAVE THE CONSULTANTS YOU HIRED ALWAYS BEEN 09:45:13 21 A MISREPRESENTS, TELLS ME HE CAN DO SOMETHING AND <br />22 SUCCESSFUL? 22 DOESN'T SUCCEED. <br />09:45:13 23 MR, BISNO: OBJECTION. VAGUE AS TO TIME. 09:45:13 23 Q SO WHAT WAS THE NEXT PROJECT YOU AND <br />09:45:13 24 Q BY MR. RUBINER: EVER. 24 MR. DALESANDRD WORKED ON AFTER THE ROYAL CANYON PROJECT? <br />09:15:13 25 A I WOULD SAY NOT ALWAYS. 09:45:13 25 A THE NEXT AGREEMENT I SIGNED WAS FOR THE <br />113 115 <br />- PAGE 119 PAGE 116 <br />DO:45:13 1 Q WHEN YOU MET WITH MR, DALESANDRO, DID HE TELL 09:45:13 1 SINATRA & COOK PROJECT BUT I THINK IT'S A STRETCH TO SAY <br />2 YOU ANYTHING ABOUT HIS BACKGROUND? 2 WE WORKED ON IT. <br />09:15:13 3 A I DON'T RECALL. 09:45:13 3 Q WHY DID YOU ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH HIM <br />09:45:13 4 Q DID YOU TELL MR. DALESANDRD ANYTHING ABOUT YOUR 4 ABOUT SINATR.A COOK? <br />5 BACKGROUND? 09:45:13 5 A WE WERE COMING -- THE SINATRA & COOK PROJECT <br />09:15:13 6 A I DON'T RECALL. 6 BAD A LOAN COME DUE AND THE LENDER WAS ASKING FOR <br />09:45:13 7 Q DO YOU RECALL EVER TELLING MR. DALESANDRO THAT 7 PAYMENT, FILED AN NOD AND WE WERE LOOKING FOR CAPITAL TO <br />8 YOU WERE A MEMBER OF THE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE? 8 TAKE THEM OUT. THEY WERE WILLING TO STAY IN THE DEAL <br />D9:45:13 9 MR, BISNO: OBJECTION. VAGUE AS TO TIME. 9 AND EXTEND THE LOAN BUT IN THAT ENVIRONMENT IN LATE 2010 <br />09:45:13 10 THE WITNESS: I DON'T RECALL THAT AND I WOULDN'T 10 THERE WAS A LOT OF DEVELOPERS GETTING DPO'S AND WE <br />11 SAY BECAUSE I'M NOT. 11 THOUGHT WE WOULD GO OUT TO MARKET, AND WE HAD TALKED TO <br />09:45:13 12 Q BY MR. RUBINER: WERE YOU EVER A MEMBER OF THE 12 THE GUYS AT GEORGE SMITH, A GUY NAMED ALLAN FRIEDMAN, A <br />13 URBAN LAND INSTITUTE? 13 GUY NAMED HACKMAN, I FORGOT MR. HACKMAN'S FIRST NAME. <br />09:15:13 14 A NOT THAT I RECALL. 14 MICHAEL HACKMAN. AND WE WERE LOOKING TO GET A SUM OF <br />09:45:13 15 Q DID YOU EVER REPRESENT TO ANYBODY YOU WERE A 15 MONEY TOGETHER TO TARE OUT THE EXISTING LENDER BECAUSE <br />16 MEMBER OF THE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE? 16 THE ENVIRONMENT WAS SUCH THAT WE THOUGHT IT WAS FEASIBLE <br />)9:45:13 17 A NOT THAT I RECALL. 17 TO DO SO. IN OUR CONVERSATIONS WITH THE LENDER UP UNTIL <br />)9:15:13 18 0 DID YOU EVER SUBMIT A BIOGRAPHY TO ANYBODY 18 THAT TIME THERE CERTAINLY SEEMED TO BE "YOU CAN COME <br />19 WHERE YOU IDENTIFIED YOURSELF AS A MEMBER OF THE URBAN 19 TALK TO US." <br />20 LAND INSTITUTE? 09:45:13 20 Q SO WHY DID YOU, - DID YOU RAISE THE ISSUE OF <br />)9:45:13 21 MR. BISNO: OBJECTION. VAGUE AS TO TIME, 21 WORKING ON SINATRA COOK WITH MR, DALESANDRD? <br />)9:45:13 22 THE WITNESS: NOT THAT I RECALL. 09:45:13 22 A MY RECOLLECTION IS HE ASKED ME ABOUT FINDING A <br />)9:45:13 23 Q BY MR. RUBINER: IN YOUR VIEW, WAS 23 BUYER AND HE WOULD GET A FEE TO GET A BUYER AND I <br />24 MR. DALESANDRD SUCCESSFUL IN HIS WORK FOR THE ROYAL 24 BELIEVED THAT WE DISCUSSED IT BUT THE FUNDS THAT WERE <br />25 CANYON PROJECT? 25 DUE TO WELLS FARGO LIKELY MADE THAT VIRTUALLY <br />1141 116 <br />Dalesandro vs. Ogulnick <br />Deposition of Ryan Andrew Ogulnick, Vol. 1 <br />August 13, 2012 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.