My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - NON-AGENDA
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
09/01/2020
>
CORRESPONDENCE - NON-AGENDA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2020 10:57:06 AM
Creation date
8/31/2020 10:50:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
9/1/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
R. Leonard, C.S.R., Inc. <br />Certified Shorthand Reporters <br />818.995.2449 <br />SHEET 32 PAGE 125 PAGE 127 <br />1 TO THAT HE WAIVED IT BY VOLUNTARILY DISCUSSING PART OF 1 SIGN THIS EXHIBIT 7 ON OR ABOUT SEPTEMBER 20TH, 2010? <br />2 THAT CONVERSATION THAT RACHEL PRODUCED THE DOCUMENTS, SO 09:45:13 2 A N0, <br />3 ANY PRIVILEGE WOULD OTHERWISE BE WAIVED. 09:45:13 3 Q AND DID YOU EVER DISCUSS EXHIBIT 7 WITH <br />09:45:13 4 MR. BISNO: I DISAGREE AND MY INSTRUCTION STANDS. 4 MR, DALESANDRD PRIOR TO YOUR SIGNING IT ON OR ABOUT <br />09:45:13 5 THE WITNESS; I RECALL TELLING RACHEL TO PRODUCE 5 SEPTEMBER 20TH, 2010? <br />6 THE DOCUMENTS AS REQUIRED IN THE SUBPOENA. 09:45:13 6 A LIKELY. <br />09:45:13 7 Q BY MR. RUBINER: WHEN DID YOU TELL RACHEL THAT? 09:45:13 7 Q WHEN WAS THE FIRST TIME YOU DISCUSSED EXHIBIT 7 <br />D9:45:13 8 MR. BISNO: OBJECTION TO THE EXTENT AS I HAD 8 WITH MR. UALESANDRO? <br />9 EARLIER ADVISED YOU THAT ANSWERING THE QUESTION WLL 09:45:13 9 A I HAVE NO DEFINITIVE RECOLLECTION OF A SPECIFIC <br />10 CAUSE YOU TO REPORT SPOUSAL COMMUNICATIONS. 10 CONVERSATION. <br />09:45:13 li THE WITNESS: I DON'T RECALL. 09:45:13 Il Q HOW MANY CONVERSATIONS DO YOU BELIEVE YOU HAD <br />09:45:13 12 MR. RUBINER; LET'S TAKE A FIVE-MINUTE BREAX. 12 WITH MR. DALESANDRD ABOUT EXHIBIT 7? <br />09:15:13 13 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: WE'RE OFF THE RECORD 2:32 P.M. 09:45:13 13 A TWO OR THREE. <br />09:15:13 14 (RECESS HELD). 09:45:13 14 Q WHEN WAS THE FIRST CONVERSATION YOU HAD? <br />09:45:13 IS THE VIDEOGRAPHER: WE'RE ON THE RECORD 2:45 P.M. 09:45:13 15 MR, BISND: OBJECTION. ASKED AND ANSWERED. THE <br />09:45:13 16 Q BY MR. RUBINER: LET'S GO BACK ON THE RECORD. 16 WITNESS TESTIFIED HE HAS NO DEFINITIVE RECOLLECTION OF <br />09:45:13 11 OFF THE RECORD I ASKED THE COURT REPORTER TO 17 ANY CONVERSATION. <br />18 MARK AS EXHIBIT 7 A MULTI -PAGE -- 09:45:13 16 THE WITNESS: I RECOLLECT TELLING MR. DALESANDRD <br />D9:45:13 19 MR. BISNO: THANK YOU, 19 THAT WE HAD A LOAN WITH WELLS FARGO, THE LOAN HAD COME <br />09:45:13 20 MR. RUBINER: -- DOCUMENT TITLED CONSULTING AND 20 DUE FEBRUARY OF 2010, WE WERE DISCUSSING THE LOAN WITH <br />21 ADVISORY AGREEMENT AND ASKED HER TO HAND THAT TO THE 21 THE LOAN OFFICERS AND TRYING TO GET TO A RESOLUTION. <br />22 WITNESS. 22 THEIR RESOLUTION WAS TO HAVE US EXTEND THE LOAN, <br />09:45:13 23 (WHEREUPON, THE ABOVE -MENTIONED DOCUMENT WAS 23 STABILIZE THE ASSET AND SEE WHERE WE ARE IN A FEW YEARS, <br />24 MARKED FOR IDENTIFICATION BY THE SHORTHAND REPORTER AND 09:45:13 24 OUR INITIAL RESOLUTION WAS TO BRING NEW MONEY <br />25 ATTACHED BERETS). 25 AND WE HAD HIRED AT LEAST TWO BROKERS BEFORE SEAN AND <br />125 1 127 <br />PAGE 126 PAGE 128 <br />D9:45:13 1 THE WITNESS: YOU SAID -- THIS IS SIX. DID YOU 1 DECIDED TO HIRE A THIRD TO FIND NEW MONEY TO SEE IF WE <br />2 JUST SAY SEVEN? ON. I'M SORRY. 2 COULD GET TO AN AMOUNT POSSIBLY THE PARTNERSHIP WOULD <br />09:45:13 3 Q BY MR. RUBINER: DO YOU HAVE EXHIBIT 7 IN FRONT 3 PUT SOME EQUITY ON TOP OF IT, AS WELL, AND BE IN A <br />4 OF YOU? - 4 POSITION TO CO A DISCOUNTED PAYOFF WITH WELLS. <br />09:45:13 5 A I DO. 09:45:13 5 AS I TESTIFIED EARLIER, I WAS SKEPTICAL THAT <br />09:15:13 6 Q TURN TO THE LAST PAGE OF EXHIBIT 7, DO YOU 6 THE NEW MONEY WOULD GET TO A PLACE THAT WOULD BE <br />7 HAVE THE LAST PAGE IN FRONT OF YOU? 7 SUFFICIENT OR CLOSE TO IT BASED ON HAVING SPOKE TO A <br />09:45:13 8 A I DO. 8 COUPLE OTHER BROKERS AND MAYBE EVEN SIGNING AN AGREEMENT <br />09:15:13 9 Q YOU'LL SEE THERE'S A SIGNATURE ON THAT PAGE, 9 WITH ANOTHER BROKER TO GO GET NEW MONEY. <br />10 DO YOU SEE THAT? 09:45:13 10 Q BY MR. RUBINER: WHO WAS THE -- WHEN YOU SAY <br />09:45:13 11 A I DO. 11 'MAYBE EVEN SIGNING AN AGREEMENT,° WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY <br />09:45:13 12 Q DO YOU RECOGNIZE THAT SIGNATURE? 12 TEAT? <br />09:45:13 13 A I DO. 09:45:13 13 A I THINK WE SIGNED AN AGREEMENT WITH GEORGE <br />09:45:13 14 Q WHOSE SIGNATURE IS THAT? 14 SMITH. <br />09:45:13 15 A THAT'S MINE. 09:45:13 15 Q WHEN DID YOU SIGN AN AGREEMENT WITH GEORGE <br />09:45:13 16 Q OKAY. 16 SMITH? <br />09:45:13 17 AND YOU SEE NEXT TO THAT THERE IS A 9/20AD? 09:45:13 17 A WOULD HAVE BEEN MID SPRING, SAY MARCH OR APRIL <br />18 DO YOU SEE THAT? 18 OF 2010. <br />09:15:13 19 A I DO, 09:45:13 19 Q WAS MR, SMITH -- STRIKE THAT. IS GEORGE SMITH <br />09:45:13 20 Q AND DID YOU WRITE THAT ON EXHIBIT 7? 20 A PERSON OR A COMPANY? <br />D9:45:13 21 A IT SURE LOOKS LIKE MY HANDWRITING. 09:45:13 21 A GEORGE PASSED AWAY A30UT FIVE YEARS AGO. IT <br />09:45:13 22 Q AND IS IT YOUR PRACTICE TO HANDWRITE A DATE THE 22 USED TO BE A COMPANY AND NOW IT'S -- IT'S A COMPANY. <br />23 SAME DAY THAT YOU ACTUALLY SIGN THE DOCUMENT? 09:45:13 23 Q 50 RHO AT GEORGE SMITH IN THE SPRING OF 2010 <br />09:15:13 24 A YES. 24 WAS IT THAT YOU MERE WORKING WITH? <br />09:45:13 25 Q DO YOU HAVE ANY REASON TO BELIEVE YOU DIDN'T 09:45:13 25 A GEORGE SMITH HAD, WAS THE BROKER WHO 3ROUGHT US <br />126 128 <br />Dalesandro vs. Ogulnick <br />Deposition of Ryan Andrew Ogulnick, Vol. 1 <br />August 13, 2012 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.