My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - NON-AGENDA
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
09/01/2020
>
CORRESPONDENCE - NON-AGENDA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2020 10:57:06 AM
Creation date
8/31/2020 10:50:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
9/1/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />CASE NUMBER: <br />CASE NAME: <br />SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA <br />DEPARTMENT 0 <br />REPORTER: <br />TIME: <br />BC469863, ETC. <br />OGULNICK, ET AL. <br />TUESDAY, DECEMBER 6, 2016 <br />LISA HART COLE, JUDGE <br />MARK SCHWEITZER, CSR 10514 <br />10:46 A.M. <br />-000- <br />THE FOLLOWING PROCEEDINGS WERE HELD IN <br />OPEN COURT OUTSIDE THE PRESENCE OF THE JURY: <br />THE COURT: All right. We'll go on the record. <br />Counsel are present. Do you wish to state your appearances? <br />MR. SHORE: Robert Shore and Laith Mosely of Raines <br />Feldman for VDC at the Met and the Ilus entities. <br />MR. COONTZ: Good morning, your Honor. <br />Stephen Coontz for the Ogulnick defendants. <br />MR. SHAHRIARI: Good morning, your Honor. <br />Cyrus Shahriari here on behalf of plaintiffs and <br />cross -defendants Sean Dalesandro and Parallel Real Estate <br />Advisors, LLC. <br />THE COURT: Good morning. The jury asked two <br />questions. The first question is as follows: "If you answer, <br />quotation marks, no, end quotation marks, to a question that <br />subsequently asked you to skip to a section, and the minimum <br />required jurors answered yes and continue to the next <br />question, is the person who voted no supposed to answer <br />questions in the remaining of the section?" <br />And in my reading of this, the answer is yes. Does <br />Coalition Court Reporters 1213.471.2966 1 www.ccrola.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.