Laserfiche WebLink
Ordinance Prohibiting Syringe Exchange Programs in Santa Ana <br />September 15, 2020 <br />Page 2 <br />resulted in syringe litter, which created environmental impacts to public health and safety that had <br />not been addressed through CEQA environmental review; the City of Santa Ana supported this <br />litigation. <br />At the March 19, 2019 meeting, Councilmember Penaloza introduced Item 85A: Discuss and <br />Consider Directing Staff to Draft a Resolution Supporting California Senate Bill 689 which will <br />Restrict the California Department of Public Health from Authorizing or Re -Authorizing Needle and <br />Syringe Exchange Programs Unless a City or County has Approved the Request. The consensus <br />among the City Council was to direct staff to prepare a letter of support for Senate Bill 689. SB 689 <br />would have required the Department of Public Health to authorize or reauthorize a clean needle <br />and syringe exchange project entity pursuant to existing law only if the city or county in which the <br />entity will be operating has adopted an ordinance or resolution approving that authorization or <br />reauthorization. SB 689 failed in the Senate Health Committee in April 2019. <br />Following direction received at the July 29, 2019 Legislative Affairs, Ethics, Transparency and <br />Communications Council Committee meeting, on September 17, 2019, the City Council adopted a <br />resolution opposing the establishment of Clean Needle and Syringe Exchange Program <br />Operations in the City of Santa Ana. This resolution reaffirmed Councilmember Penaloza's <br />discussion of a resolution to oppose the establishment of needle exchange operations within the <br />City of Santa Ana. <br />On October 25, 2019, following the earlier issuance of a preliminary injunction, the San Diego <br />County Superior Court ruled in favor of the County of Orange and the other plaintiff cities, finding <br />that the mobile SEP approved through the CDPH authorization was a "project" subject to CEQA <br />review. The mobile SEP was blocked from operating and did not operate as a result of the Court's <br />ruling. <br />No cities in Orange County affirmatively permit SEPs and there are no syringe exchange programs <br />currently authorized to operate in Orange County. The City of Orange has banned mobile SEPs, <br />and the City of Costa Mesa has banned the establishment and/or operation of hypodermic needle <br />and syringe exchange programs within its city limits. Additionally, the City of Anaheim recently <br />banned all SEPs within its jurisdiction. These local regulations prohibiting SEPs address concerns <br />regarding potential environmental impacts to surrounding properties and neighborhoods <br />associated with operation of SEPs, including the endangerment to the public peace, health and <br />welfare due to the proliferation of both used and unused hypodermic needles. <br />Ordinance to Ban SEPs <br />The proposed ordinance would ban SEPs on public and/or private property, including, but not <br />limited to, the following: a public street, alley, sidewalk, or right-of-way, and all locations, areas, <br />and/or zoning districts in the City of Santa Ana. Further, the proposed ordinance provides that, <br />except as provided by state law, it shall be unlawful for any person or entity to own, manage, <br />conduct, or operate, or as a landlord or land owner to allow or permit to exist, or be established, <br />conducted, operated, owned or managed on or within real property owned or controlled by such <br />�. 1 <br />