Laserfiche WebLink
Figure 3. What most closely fits your model of civilian oversight? —NACOLE model definitions (n = 40) <br />P Investigative ■ Review <br />■ Auditor/Monitor N Other <br />As shown in figure 3, 28 agencies (70 percent) reported one of the three NACOLE models: investigation - <br />focused (independent investigations of misconduct allegations), review -focused (review the quality of <br />completed internal affairs), or auditor/monitor-focused (inspector general, audit processes, review complaint <br />investigations). Twelve agencies (30 percent) classified their oversight body as being either a combination of <br />these models or another type of model completely. <br />• The most common type of civilian oversight boards were review -focused (n = 16). <br />• Auditor/monitor-focused boards were used least frequently (n = 4). <br />• Twelve MCCA agencies reported "other," which usually meant they used some hybrid of these models or <br />had two separate bodies with oversight authority. <br />General authorities <br />MCCA agencies reported the authorities their agency's model of civilian oversight possessed. While two <br />agencies (Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and Honolulu, Hawaii) reported their board as having all the authorities <br />listed, most agencies' oversight bodies had varying levels of authority. <br />65A-20 Civilian Oversight Survey <br />