My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
65A - POLICE OVERSIGHT DIRECTION
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
09/15/2020
>
65A - POLICE OVERSIGHT DIRECTION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2020 5:28:47 PM
Creation date
9/10/2020 5:15:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
City Manager's Office
Item #
65A
Date
9/15/2020
Destruction Year
2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Program costs. Although costs are not a measure of effectiveness, they should be clearly understood for <br />the different models of civilian oversight. Knowing the cost of the investment helps in determining what <br />approach may be best for a particular community. The costs include the police department investigation. <br />If a community has a review model, for example, the police investigative and support costs should be <br />included. The costs of investigations conducted by the oversight agency might be compared with the police <br />investigative costs. <br />Resolution of complaints. Although there are variations from one community to another, most use four <br />investigative outcomes. <br />1. Unfounded. Investigation shows the events complained of did not occur or the subject of the complaint <br />was not involved. <br />2. Exonerated. The actions of the subject of the complaint were justified, lawful, and proper. <br />3. Not sustained. The investigation failed to find evidence to clearly prove or disprove the allegation. <br />4. Sustained. The investigation discovered sufficient evidence to clearly prove the allegation. <br />Investigative outcomes should be tracked and regularly shared with the community in statistical reports. <br />Police and oversight bodies have been criticized for the low rate of complaints that are sustained. A 2006 <br />Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) report indicated that use of force complaints in departments with more <br />than 100 officers were sustained 8 percent of the time." Thirty-four percent of the complaints were not <br />sustained, 25 percent were declared unfounded, and 23 percent were exonerated.18 Jurisdictions with a <br />civilian complaint review board sustained complaints 6 percent of the time; those without a board sustained <br />11 percent of the complaints," These statistics are important to the community, and they require an <br />explanation. <br />Public trust and confidence. Round table participants thought an effort should be made to periodically <br />measure the level of confidence in the oversight body and the police. National polls routinely ask the public <br />about their trust and confidence in the police —community residents could be surveyed to gain insight into <br />the impact of civilian oversight on trust and confidence. <br />17. Hickman, Citizen Complaints. <br />18. Hickman, Citizen Complaints. <br />19. Hickman, Citizen Complaints. <br />Civilian Oversight of the Police in Major Cities 65A-39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.