My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 65A
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
09/15/2020
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 65A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/15/2020 3:44:23 PM
Creation date
9/14/2020 11:57:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
65A
Date
9/15/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a. Outcomes of board investigations must be public and in writing. <br />b. Findings of fact must be binding on the Police Department. Only when a clear error has been <br />made could the Chief depart from these findings. <br />c. The Board must have a role in officer discipline, such as by making determinations under a pre- <br />negotiated matrix developed by the Council and board. The matrix must also specify the <br />circumstances in which a Police Department employee must be removed from active duty, <br />pending an investigation by the board and/or the Police Department. The board can also help <br />ensure the availability of adequate support for officers in parallel and independent from discipline. <br />d. Evidence of criminal activity must also be referred for potential prosecution. <br />e. The board must possess the power to remove the Police Chief for cause (such as failure to <br />cooperate with the board) and be involved in appointing the Police Chief. <br /> <br />5. Power to audit, issue recommendations, and set policy. <br />a. The board must also have authority to audit practices, policies, and procedures of the Police <br />Department. <br />b. On the basis of such audits, the board must be empowered to set and change Police Department <br />policies as well as consult in hiring, training, and collective bargaining. <br />c. The board must have the power to review and make recommendations regarding the Police <br />Department budget and budgeting process. <br /> <br />6. Secure funding. <br />a. The board’s funding must be protected to ensure its independence, for example, by setting the <br />board’s budget at a fixed percentage of the Police Department’s budget or in proportion to the size <br />of the force. <br />b. The board budget must support appropriate board staffing and training on the requirements of <br />constitutional policing and Police Department policies. <br /> <br />7. Due process protections for police officers. <br />a. Officers who are accused of misconduct must have the full range of due process protections in the <br />investigatory and disciplinary process, including Skelly rights and the rights to access to counsel, <br />to a hearing, and to an appeal. Officers must be permitted to view the evidence presented against <br />them, to testify, and to offer statements to defend against misconduct allegations. <br />b. The board must employ a preponderance of the evidence standard. <br /> <br />8. Community engagement and public access and reporting. <br />a. The board itself must publicize regular written reports and publicly produce data regarding police <br />practices, such as crime data and data on the use of force, stops, and arrests, as well as details <br />regarding complaints and settlements. <br />b. The board must also hold regular public meetings, which must be webcast and recorded, to <br />summarize findings and engage with community members. <br />c. The board itself should be accountable to the public. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.