Laserfiche WebLink
Based on the substantial evidence set forth in the record, including but not <br />limited to the 2010 EIR and the 2020 Third & Broadway Addendum, the <br />City Council finds that an addendum is the appropriate document for <br />disclosing the changes to the subject properties, and that none of the <br />conditions identified in Public Resources Code section 21166 and State <br />CEQA Guidelines section 15162 requiring subsequent environmental <br />review have occurred, because: <br />A. The project does not constitute a substantial change that would <br />require major revisions of the 2010 EIR due to the involvement of <br />new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in <br />the severity of previously identified significant effects. <br />B. There is not a substantial change with respect to the circumstances <br />under which the project will be developed that would require major <br />revisions of the 2010 EIR due to the involvement of new significant <br />environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the <br />previously identified significant effects. <br />C. New information of substantial importance has not been presented <br />that was not known and could not have been known with the <br />exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the 2010 EIR was <br />certified or adopted, showing any of the following: (i) that the <br />modifications would have one or more significant effects not <br />discussed in the earlier environmental documentation; (ii) that <br />significant effects previously examined would be substantially more <br />severe than shown in the earlier environmental documentation; (iii) <br />that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be <br />feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce <br />one or more significant effects, but the applicant declined to adopt <br />such measures; or (iv) that mitigation measures or alternatives <br />considerably different from those analyzed previously would <br />substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the <br />environment, but which the applicant declined to adopt. <br />Section 4. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting the public <br />hearing, hereby approves Density Bonus Agreement No. 2020-01, Site Plan Review No. <br />2020-01, Site Plan Review No. 2020-02 as conditioned in Exhibit A, attached hereto and <br />incorporated as though fully set forth herein. This decision is based upon the evidence <br />submitted at the above said hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Request for <br />City Council Action dated October 20, 2020, and exhibits attached thereto; and the public <br />testimony, written and oral, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. <br />***Signatures on following page*** <br />ADOPTED this day of 12020. <br />Resolution No. 2020-xx <br />75A-30 Page 6 of 18 <br />