Laserfiche WebLink
Section 2. CEQA Compliance. In accordance with the California Environmental <br />Quality Act (CEQA), the City Council of the City of Santa Ana has, as a result of its <br />consideration of the record as a whole and the evidence presented at the hearings on this <br />matter, determined that, as required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act <br />(CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines, Environmental Review No. 2019-85 meets all <br />the requirements of CEQA. <br />Based on the substantial evidence set forth in the record, including but not limited <br />to the 2010 EIR and the 2020 Third & Broadway Addendum, the City Council finds that <br />an addendum is the appropriate document for disclosing the changes to the subject <br />properties, and that none of the conditions identified in Public Resources Code section <br />21166 and State CEQA Guidelines section 15162 requiring subsequent environmental <br />review have occurred. because: <br />A. The project does not constitute a substantial change that would require <br />major revisions of the 2010 EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental <br />effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. <br />B. There is not a substantial change with respect to the circumstances under <br />which the project will be developed that would require major revisions of the 2010 EIR <br />due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase <br />in the severity of the previously identified significant effects. <br />C. New information of substantial importance has not been presented that was <br />not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at <br />the time the 2010 EIR was certified or adopted, showing any of the following: (i) that the <br />modifications would have one or more significant effects not discussed in the earlier <br />environmental documentation; (ii) that significant effects previously examined would be <br />substantially more severe than shown in the earlier environmental documentation; (iii) <br />that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact <br />be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects, but the <br />applicant declined to adopt such measures; or (iv) that mitigation measures or alternatives <br />considerably different from those analyzed previously would substantially reduce one or <br />more significant effects on the environment, but which the applicant declined to adopt. <br />Section 3. Approval of DDA. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana <br />approves the DDA, in substantially the form attached to this Resolution as Exhibit "A," <br />and authorizes the City Manager, acting on behalf of the City Council, to sign and enter <br />into the DDA and perform the obligations of the City Council pursuant to the DDA. <br />Section 4. The applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City <br />and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, authorized <br />volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims, demands, <br />lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other and proceedings (whether legal, equitable, <br />declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolution <br />procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and such other <br />