Laserfiche WebLink
PALMIERI <br />HENNESSEY <br />LEIFER, LLP <br />Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers of <br />the City of Santa Ana <br />October 20, 2020 <br />Page 4 <br />There are significant impacts to the adiacent redeveloped historic properties such as the <br />Spurgeon Building as a result of the proposed height, massing, floor area ratio and parking <br />waivers/concessions: <br />The Project proposes significant waivers/concessions to deviate from the development <br />standards which were analyzed and approved in the 2010 FIR. Indeed, in its analysis of the <br />impact of the Transit Zoning Code on historic sites, the 2010 FIR provided that the design and <br />development standards contained within the Transit Zoning Code "contain detailed requirements <br />in regards to building types, frontage types, massing, height, architecture, accessibility, <br />parking, street presence and landscaping. These standards are specifically designed to ensure <br />that new development within established neighborhoods, as well as existing commercial areas, is <br />sensitive to the existing built form of that area." (2010 EIR, Sec. 4.4, p. 4.4-17 [emphasis <br />added].) Specific to this area, the 2010 FIR states, "The DT Zone creates a cohesive and <br />consistent set of requirements to ensure that any new projects developed within the Zone adhere <br />to a unified set of standards, thereby ensuring that all new development within the Historic <br />Downtown is considered within the same context as opposed to having a patchwork of <br />standalone zones. Specifically, the DT Zone limits building heights based upon the existing <br />historic context of the buildings currently located in the Historic Downtown." (Id. at p. 4.4- <br />18 [emphasis added].) <br />Even with those "detailed requirements" and design/development standards, the 2010 <br />FIR concluded the Transit Zoning Code would cause a substantial adverse change in the <br />significance of historical resources and that such effects were significant and unavoidable. (See <br />Id. at p. 4.4-22.) <br />Now, a decade later, with proposed development at the rear frontage of one of the most <br />historic street frontages in Santa Ana including the Spurgeon Building the City seeks to <br />dispose or ignore the very standards it imposed. Height ignored. Massing more is more. <br />Floor Area Ratio let's get the numerator to be as high as possible. The conduct goes even <br />further as it completely omits any analysis that such deviations would have on the redeveloped <br />historic sites like the Spurgeon Building. <br />The proposed Project proposes a height 150 percent taller than the height limit imposed a <br />decade ago. Essentially, no standards are applied if a building can be constructed half again <br />taller than the limit. The proposed Wilshire Blvd. -type Project absolutely dwarfs the historic <br />surroundings. The height limit was adopted and imposed for a reason because a 16-story <br />building within the historic downtown area of Santa Ana is not in keeping with the character of <br />the area. The height will have a negative impact on the historic and redeveloped Spurgeon <br />Building its clocktower and its companion properties Here is an obvious question, what <br />