My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RESO 2020-32_201 W THIRD STREET
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
PLANNING COMMISION
>
2020
>
RESO 2020-32_201 W THIRD STREET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2020 2:12:58 PM
Creation date
10/22/2020 2:12:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Resolution No. 2020-32 <br />Page 3 of 8 <br />SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by <br />reference. <br />SECTION 2. State CEQA Guidelines section 15164 requires lead agencies to <br />prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions to the <br />project are necessary, but none of the conditions requiring preparation of a subsequent <br />EIR are present. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the 2010 EIR <br />and the 2020 Addendum, and finds that these documents taken together contain a <br />complete and accurate reporting of all of the potential environmental impacts associated <br />with the proposed development. The Planning Commission further finds that the 2020 <br />Addendum has been completed in compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA <br />Guidelines. The Planning Commission further finds and determines that the Addendum <br />reflects the City’s independent judgment. <br />SECTION 3. Based on the substantial evidence set forth in the record, including <br />but not limited to the 2010 EIR and the 2020 Addendum, the Planning Commission finds <br />that an addendum is the appropriate document for disclosing the changes to the subject <br />property, and that none of the conditions identified in Public Resources Code section <br />21166 and State CEQA Guidelines section 15162 requiring subsequent en vironmental <br />review have occurred, because: <br />(a) The proposed development does not constitute a substantial change that <br />would require major revisions of the 2010 EIR due to the involvement of <br />new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the <br />severity of previously identified significant effects. <br />(b) There is not a substantial change with respect to the circumstances under <br />which the proposed development will be developed that would require <br />major revisions of the 2010 EIR due to the involvement of new significant <br />environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the <br />previously identified significant effects. <br />(c) New information of substantial importance has not been presented that <br />was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of <br />reasonable diligence at the time the 2010 EIR was certified or adopted, <br />showing any of the following: (i) that the modifications would have one or <br />more significant effects not discussed in the earlier environmental <br />documentation; (ii) that significant effects previously examined would be <br />substantially more severe than shown in the earlier environmental <br />documentation; (iii) that mitigation measures or alternatives previously <br />found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and woul d substantially <br />reduce one or more significant effects, but the applicant declined to adopt <br />such measures; or (iv) that mitigation measures or alternatives <br />considerably different from those analyzed previously would substantially <br />reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but which the <br />applicant declined to adopt.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.