My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5 1109 N BROADWAY
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2020
>
03-30-20 Special Meeting
>
5 1109 N BROADWAY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2020 9:33:47 PM
Creation date
11/9/2020 9:31:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
275
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
O NE B RO A D WA Y P LA Z A P RO J E CT E I R A D DE N DU M CI T Y O F S A NT A A NA <br />5. Environmental Analysis <br />March 2020 Page 47 <br />Comments: <br />a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, <br />or death involving: <br />i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist -Priolo <br />Earthquake Fault Zoning map, issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other <br />substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special <br />Publication 42. <br />No Impact. As analyzed in the Certified EIR, no active or potentially active faults cross or project into <br />the Project Site. Fault rupture is not expected to impact the Project Site. No impact would occur, and no <br />changes or new information would require preparation of a subsequent EIR. <br />ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? <br />Less Than Significant Impact/No Changes or New Information Requiring Preparation of an <br />EIR. As discussed in the Certified EIR, seismic hazard from ground shaking is typical of Southern <br />California. The Proposed Project, similar to the Approved Project, would be designed in accordance with <br />the seismic design provisions of the Uniform Building Code to promote maximum safety in the event of <br />an earthquake. Similar to the Approved Project, the Proposed Project would comply with Mitigation <br />Measure G-4. Impacts would be less than significant and no changes or new information wo uld require <br />preparation of a subsequent EIR. <br />iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? <br />No Impact. As discussed in the Certified EIR, th e Project Site is not located within a liquefaction zon e <br />(DOC 1998). Therefore, the Proposed Project would not result in any new impacts or increase the severity <br />of impacts with respect to liquefaction compared to the Approved Project and impacts would remain less <br />than significant. <br />iv) Landslides? <br />No Impact. the Project Site is not located within an earthquake-induced landside zone (DOC 1998). The <br />Project Site is generally flat and located within an urbanized area. No impact is anticipated, and no <br />mitigation is required. No changes or new information from the Proposed Project would require the <br />preparation of a subsequent EIR. <br />b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? <br />No Impact. The Proposed Project does not increase building area nor construct additional floor area. The <br />Proposed Project would occur within the Approved Project’s building envelope. As such, the Proposed Project <br />would not result in the soil erosion or loss of topsoil. The Proposed Project would comply with identified <br />mitigation measures. There are no substantial changes in the circumstances, or new information that was not <br />5 - 101
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.