My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5 1109 N BROADWAY
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2020
>
03-30-20 Special Meeting
>
5 1109 N BROADWAY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2020 9:33:47 PM
Creation date
11/9/2020 9:31:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
275
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
O NE B RO A D WA Y P LA Z A P RO J E CT E I R A D DE N DU M CI T Y O F S A NT A A NA <br />5. Environmental Analysis <br />Page 44 PlaceWorks <br />Environmental Issues <br />Substantial Change in Project <br />Requiring Major EIR Revisions <br />Substantial Change in Circum-stances <br />Requiring Major EIR Revisions <br />New Information Showing New <br />or Increased Significant Effects <br />Less Than Significant <br />Impact/No Changes or New Information <br />Requiring Preparation of an EIR No Impact <br />a) Result potentially significant environmental <br />impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or <br />unnecessary consumption of energy <br />resources, during project construction or <br />operation? <br /> x <br />b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan <br />for renewable energy or energy efficiency? x <br /> <br />Comments <br />a) Result potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary <br />consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? <br />Less Than Significant Impact/No Changes or New Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. <br />The Certified EIR determined that the Approved Project would be adequately served by the existing electricity <br />and natural gas infrastructure. The Approved Project would not require elect ricity or natural gas facilities <br />beyond those planned or readily available or a substantial expansion of existing facilities. The Proposed Project <br />would occur within the building envelope of the Approved Project. The Proposed Project would not increase <br />the square footage of the approved building. Development of the Approved Project and Proposed Project <br />would be required to comply with California energy efficiency standards. The Proposed Project would place <br />residential units into a previously approved office tower with commercial uses. The inclusion of residential uses <br />within the Approved Project would create mixed-use development would further promotes active <br />transportation, such as walking, and reduces dependency on vehicles. Therefore, the Proposed Project would <br />not be expected to result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources. As a result, <br />the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of <br />previously identified effects related, no change or new information would require preparation of a subsequent <br />EIR. <br />b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? <br />Less Than Significant Impact/No Changes or New Information Requiring Preparati on of an EIR. <br />Energy consumption of new buildings in California is regulated by the State Building Energy Efficiency <br />Standards, embodied in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR) which establishes “energy <br />budgets” and efficiency standards that regulate heating, cooling, ventilation, water heating, and lighting. The <br />Proposed Project’s electric and natural gas consumption would be in accordance with State and City regulations <br />and practices. As such, the Proposed Project, as with the Approved Project would be considered consistent <br />with the goals and policies of the City’s Conservation Element (1982) and Energy Element (1982). Impacts <br />5 - 98
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.