Laserfiche WebLink
SAFER Comments on Addendum to One Broadway Plaza EIR <br />March 30, 2020 <br />Page 10 of 11 <br />or supplemental EIR or negative declaration is to explore environmental impacts not considered <br />in the original environmental document.” Friends of College of San Mateo Gardens v. San <br />Mateo (2016) 1 Cal.5th 937, 949 (quoting Save Our Neighborhood v. Lishman (2006) 140 <br />Cal.App.4th 1288, 1296). <br /> <br />As discussed above, there is substantial evidence that the residential component of the <br />Project will result in a significant air quality impact to residential occupants of the Project. This <br />impact is significant and new. It could not have been known in 2004 because there was no <br />residential element of the Project at that time. Accordingly, the City violated CEQA by not <br />preparing an SEIR to analyze and mitigate this new significant impact. <br /> <br />There is no substantial evidence in the record to support a conclusion that the Project will <br />not have a new significant indoor air quality impact as a result of significant changes to the <br />Project when compared to the project analyzed in the 2004 EIR. Accordingly, the City’s <br />decision to prepare an Addendum rather than an SEIR is not supported by substantial evidence, <br />and approval of the Project based on the Addendum would constitute an abuse of discretion. <br /> <br />V. THE ADDENDUM’S CONCLUSIONS ARE NOT SUPPORTED BY <br />SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE. <br /> <br />A. There is no Evidence that the Project Will Not Result in a New Significant <br />Construction-Related Air Quality Impact <br /> <br />The Addendum concludes that the Project will not have a significant new impacts on <br />schools. This conclusion is not supported by substantial evidence because the Addendum never <br />evaluates the capacity of the nearby schools, and their ability to absorb additional students <br />created by the Project. <br /> <br />The Project site is served by Heroes Elementary School, Willard Intermediate School, <br />and Santa Ana High School. Addendum, p. 76. The Addendum finds that the “Project would <br />generate up to 402 residential units and up to 965 residents at the Project Site, some of which are <br />expected to be school-aged children.” Id. The Project is anticipated to generate approximately <br />227 students. Id. Specifically, it is expected to generate 117 elementary school students, 50 <br />middle school students, and 60 high school students. Id. at 77. According to the Addendum: <br /> <br />the Proposed Project would be required to pay SB 50 school impact <br />fees to the SAUSD. Payment of school impact fees will ensure that <br />the impact of the Proposed Project on school services are less than <br />significant level; the Proposed Project would not result in the need for <br />new or physically altered schools or result in the construction of a <br />new school. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant <br />impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously <br />identified effects. <br />