Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The Bowery Mixed-Use Project CEQA Findings of Fact <br /> <br />City of Santa Ana 57 <br />May 2020 <br />• The “No Project” alternative shall be evaluated along with its impact. The “No Project” <br />analysis shall discuss the existing conditions, as well as what would be reasonably expected <br />to occur in the foreseeable future if the Project is not approved. <br />• The range of alternatives required in an EIR is governed by a “rule of reason”; therefore, <br />the EIR must evaluate only those alternatives necessary to permit a reasoned choice. The <br />alternatives shall be limited to ones that would avoid or substantially lessen any of the <br />significant effects of the Project. <br />• For alternative locations, only locations that would avoid or substantially lessen any of the <br />significant effects of the Project need be considered for inclusion in the EIR. <br />• An EIR need not consider an alternative whose effects cannot be reasonably ascertained <br />and whose implementation is remote and speculative. <br />Rationale for Selecting Potentially Feasible Alternatives <br />The alternatives must include a no-project alternative and a range of reasonable alternatives to <br />the Project if those reasonable alternatives would attain most of the Project objectives while <br />substantially lessening the potentially significant project impacts. The range of alternatives discussed <br />in an EIR is governed by a “rule of reason,” which the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(f)(3) <br />defines as: <br />. . . set[ting] forth only those alternatives necessary to permit a reasoned choice. The <br />alternatives shall be limited to ones that would avoid or substantially lessen any of <br />the significant effects of the Project. Of those alternatives, the EIR need examine in <br />detail only the ones that the lead agency determines could feasibly attain most of <br />the basic objectives of the Project. The range of feasible alternatives shall be <br />selected and discussed in a manner to foster meaningful public participation and <br />informed decision-making. <br />Among the factors that may be taken into account when addressing the feasibility of alternatives <br />(as described in the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(f)([1]) are environmental impacts, site <br />suitability, economic viability, availability of infrastructure, general plan consistency, other plans or <br />regulatory limitations, jurisdictional boundaries, and whether the Project proponent could <br />reasonably acquire, control, or otherwise have access to an alternative site. An EIR need not consider <br />an alternative whose effects could not be reasonably identified, and whose implementation is <br />remote or speculative. <br />For purposes of this analysis, the Project alternatives are evaluated to determine the extent to which <br />they attain the basic Project objectives, while significantly lessening any significant effects of the <br />Project. <br />Alternatives Analysis <br />The goal for evaluating any alternatives is to identify ways to avoid or lessen the significant <br />environmental effects resulting from implementation of the proposed Project, while attaining most <br />of the Project objectives. The City of Santa Ana has included the following 3 alternatives for <br />consideration: <br />• No Project/No Build Alternative <br />• Reduced Project Alternative <br />3-79