My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3 - The Bowery
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2020
>
05-11-20
>
3 - The Bowery
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2020 9:59:32 PM
Creation date
11/9/2020 9:57:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
272
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The Bowery Mixed-Use Project CEQA Findings of Fact <br /> <br />City of Santa Ana 30 <br />May 2020 <br />Interior Noise. The roadways near the Project site would generate noise. However, Draft EIR Tables <br />5.10-12 through 5.10-15 show that based with a “windows closed” condition with standard <br />windows with a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) of 27, the interior noise levels of the <br />residential units would be below the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard. Therefore, impacts <br />related to interior noise would be less than significant. <br /> <br />Impact Finding: The Project would not generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne <br />noise levels (Draft EIR at p. 5.10-26). <br />Facts in Support of Findings: <br />Construction <br />Demolition, excavation, and grading activities are required for the Project and can result in varying <br />degrees of ground vibration, depending on the equipment and methods used, distance to the <br />affected structures and soil type. Based on the reference vibration levels provided by the Federal <br />Transit Administration (FTA), a large bulldozer represents the peak source of vibration with a <br />reference velocity of 0.089 in/sec PPV at 25 feet. At distances ranging from 85 to 667 feet from <br />construction, vibration levels are anticipated to range from 0.001 to 0.014 in/sec PPV, as shown <br />on Draft EIR Table 5.10-16. These vibration levels would not be sustained during the entire <br />construction period but would occur only during the times that heavy construction equipment is <br />operating in the vicinity of the sensitive receivers. This level of vibration would be below the Caltrans <br />building damage threshold of 0.3 in/sec PPV and vibration standard of 0.04 in/sec PPV for human <br />annoyance at all receiver locations. Therefore, vibration impacts would be less than significant. <br />Operation <br />Operation of the proposed commercial and multi-family uses would include heavy trucks for <br />residents moving in and out of the rental units, product deliveries to retail and restaurant uses, and <br />garbage trucks for solid waste disposal. Truck vibration levels are dependent on vehicle <br />characteristics, load, speed, and pavement conditions. However, typical vibration levels for the <br />heavy truck activity at normal traffic speeds would be approximately 0.006 in/sec PPV, based on <br />the FTA Transit Noise Impact and Vibration Assessment. Truck movements on site would be travelling <br />at very low speed, so it is expected that truck vibration at nearby sensitive receivers would be less <br />than the vibration threshold of 0.08 in/sec PPV for fragile historic buildings and 0.04 in/sec PPV <br />for human annoyance, and therefore, would be less than significant. <br /> <br />Impact Finding: The Project would not expose people residing or working in the Project area to <br />excessive airport noise levels within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport <br />(Draft EIR at p. 5.10-27). <br /> <br />Facts in Support of Findings: The exterior noise thresholds outlined in the AELUP, multi-family residential <br />development is considered normally consistent with exterior noise levels of less than 60 dBA CNEL, <br />conditionally consistent with exterior noise levels between 60 and 65 dBA CNEL and normally inconsistent <br />with exterior noise level above 65 dBA CNEL. For commercial retail land use, exterior noise levels are <br />considered normally consistent with exterior noise levels of less than 65 dBA CNEL and conditionally consistent <br />with exterior noise level above 65 dBA CNEL. <br /> <br />As shown on Draft EIR Figure 5.10-2, the Project site is located outside the 55 dBA CNEL aircraft noise level <br />contour boundaries of JWA. Therefore, according to the AELUP, the Project residential and commercial retail <br />land use is considered normally consistent with JWA aircraft noise exposure exterior noise level compatibility <br />thresholds. Also, the airport related noise at the Project site does not exceed the City’s municipal code <br />permissible noise levels. Additionally, the County’s General Aviation Noise Ordinance that prohibits <br />3-52
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.