My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3 - The Bowery_PUBLIC COMMENT (SAFER)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2020
>
05-11-20
>
3 - The Bowery_PUBLIC COMMENT (SAFER)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2020 10:00:02 PM
Creation date
11/9/2020 9:59:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Bowery Mixed-Use Project <br />CEQA Comment <br />May 11, 2020 <br />Page 13 <br /> <br />D. THE EIR FAILS TO ADEQUATELY DISCLOSE, ANALYZE, AND <br />MITIGATE THE PROJECT’S IMPACTS RELATED TO HAZARDS AND <br />HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. <br /> <br />1. The EIR fails as an informational document because it fails to disclose that <br />the Project site is contaminated with hazardous materials and is on the <br />Cortese List. <br /> <br />A Project has a significant impact on the environment if it is “located on a site that is <br />included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section <br />65962.5 [the Cortese List] and, as a result, create[s] a significant hazard to the public or the <br />environment.” CEQA, Appendix G; DEIR, 5.7-21. <br /> <br /> The DEIR states that the Project would have no such impact. It claims: <br /> <br />No Impact. The Phase I Environmental Site Assessments that was conducted database <br />searches to determine if the Project area or any nearby properties are identified as <br />currently having hazardous materials. The record searches determined that although the <br />site has a history of various uses, and identified as previously generating hazardous <br />wastes and clean-up activities, the Project site is not located on or near by a site which is <br />included on a list of hazardous materials sites pursuant to Government Code Section <br />65962.5 (Phase I 2018). <br /> <br />The Phase I ESA did not identify any nearby or surrounding area sites that are included <br />on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section <br />65962.5, and as a result, impacts related to hazards from being located on or adjacent to a <br />hazardous materials site would not occur from implementation of the proposed Project. <br /> <br />DEIR, 5.7-26. <br /> <br /> The FEIR goes on to claim that “Sites where response actions have been completed and <br />no operation and maintenance activities are required are not included on the list.” This statement <br />is false and the EIR provides not evidence to support it or the DEIR’s analysis. <br /> <br />The Department of Toxic Substances Control states in no uncertain terms in its comments <br />that the Project is on the Cortese List. See, FEIR, 2-3. The DEIR even acknowledges DTSC’s <br />expertise in this area, noting that DTSC “is responsible for a portion of the information contained <br />in the Cortese List.” DEIR, 5.7-4. <br /> <br />Closure of an underground storage tank case does not take a site off the Cortese List. A <br />case is closed if clean-up activities achieve certain standards. The level of remediation required <br />depends on the proposed future use of the site. For example, a site may be closed because it was <br />remediated to a level sufficient for the site to be used for industrial purposes, but residual
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.