Laserfiche WebLink
9.0 EIR Subject Areas Requiring No Change in Analysis <br />Avion Project SEIR <br />Page 9-1 <br />Chapter 9 <br />Black Mountain Ranch (Subarea I) Subarea <br />Plan EIR Subject Areas Requiring No Change in <br />Analysis <br />Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15163, the analysis and <br />conclusions reached in a number of the environmental subject areas contained within the 1998 <br />Black Mountain Ranch (Subarea I) Subarea Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) do not require <br />supplemental analysis and are not addressed further in this Supplemental Environmental Impact <br />Report (SEIR). This is because the project would not result in changes affecting the analysis in the <br />1998 EIR, as there were no substantial changes in circumstances or new information available with <br />respect to each subject area that would trigger a need for supplemental review (CEQA Guidelines <br />Section 15162). These subject areas include: <br />• Land Use (Plan Consistency; Land Use Conflicts) <br />• Traffic/Circulation <br />• Hydrology and Water Quality <br />• Visual Quality (Area Character, Unique Features, Landmark Trees) <br />• Air Quality (Direct Impacts) <br />• Geology and Soils <br />• Agricultural Resources/Mineral Resources <br />• Paleontological Resources <br />• Noise (Traffic Noise) <br />• Public Facilities and Services <br />• Water Conservation/Domestic Water/Wastewater <br />• Public Safety <br />• Population <br />• Cumulative Impacts related to the above issues <br />Any future environmental review related to these subjects shall be required to refer to the 1998 EIR. <br />9.1 Land Use (Plan Consistency) <br />The land use analysis in 1998 EIR concluded that the Subarea Plan would be consistent with other <br />adopted plans, and no significant impacts would occur. The project would be consistent with the <br />designated land use and density assumptions identified for Southeast Perimeter Parcel C. Therefore, <br />the project would also be consistent with adopted land use plans, and there would be no new <br />significant or substantially increased adverse impacts beyond those previously identified in the 1998 <br />EIR relative to land use plan consistency. <br />Because no site-specific design was proposed at the time the 1998 EIR was prepared, issues <br />regarding Land Development Code deviations and Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP)