Laserfiche WebLink
City of Santa Ana – The Bowery <br />May 11, 2020 <br />Page 7 of 28 <br />and governmental agencies to respond to such information.”].) If significant new <br />information was brought to the attention of an agency prior to certification, an <br />agency is required to revise and recirculate that information as part of the <br />environmental impact report. <br />1. Recirculation is Required to Give the Public an Opportunity to <br />Review and Comment Upon Changes to the Project’s <br />Transportation Analysis <br />CEQA requires that an environmental document identify and discuss the significant <br />effects of a Project, alternatives and how those significant effects can be mitigated or <br />avoided. (CEQA Guidelines § 15126.2; PRC §§ 21100(b)(1), 21002.1(a).) A Court <br />“[w]hen reviewing whether a discussion is sufficient to satisfy CEQA, . . . the EIR (1) <br />includes sufficient detail to enable those who did not participate in its preparation to <br />understand and to consider meaningfully the issues the proposed project raises <br />[citation omitted], and (2) makes a reasonable effort to substantively connect a <br />project's air quality impacts to likely health consequences.” (Sierra Club v. County of <br />Fresno (2018) 6 Cal. 5th 502, 510 [citing Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of <br />University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 405.]; see also PRC §§ 21002.1(e), 21003(b).) <br />The Court may determine whether a CEQA environmental document sufficiently <br />discloses information required by CEQA de novo as “noncompliance with the <br />information disclosure provisions” of CEQA is a failure to proceed in a manner <br />required by law. (PRC § 21005(a); see also Sierra Club v. County of Fresno (2018) 6 Cal. 5th <br />502, 515.) Failure to include all required information in a Draft EIR requires revision <br />and recirculation of the Draft EIR. <br />The FEIR requires revision and recirculation since the Project’s transportation analysis <br />was entirely redone to perform both VMT analysis as well as revised LOS analysis <br />based upon modifications to the Project. Since VMT analysis and transportation <br />analysis are required under CEQA, the failure of the DEIR to include this information <br />was an unlawful omission of information that requires revision and recirculation since <br />the DEIR was fundamentally and basically inadequate. <br /> <br />