Laserfiche WebLink
SANTA ANA'S PROPERTY BASED IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT <br />R1. The City of Santa Ana should request that its City Attorney or independent counsel conduct <br />an investigation into whether the City of Santa Ana complied with the requirements of <br />establishing a formation district; whether that district benefits all property owners <br />proportionately; and whether there are any violations or conflicts of interest. If so, the City of <br />Santa Ana should immediately take action to disestablish the district. <br />R2. The Santa Ana City Attorney and the Orange County District Attorney should investigate <br />the alleged violations of election laws and procedures. <br />REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS: <br />In accordance with California Penal Code Sections §933 and §933.05, the 2011-2012 Orange <br />County Grand Jury requires responses from each agency affected by the Findings/Conclusions <br />and Recommendations presented in this section. The responses are to be submitted to the <br />Presiding Judge of the Superior Court. <br />"Not later than 90 days after the grand jury submits a final report on the operations of <br />any public agency subject to its reviewing authority, the governing body of the public <br />agency shall comment to the presiding judge of the superior court on the findings and <br />recommendations pertaining to matters under the control of the governing body, and <br />every elected county officer or agency head for which the grand jury has responsibility <br />pursuant to Section §914.1 shall comment within 60 days to the presiding judge of the <br />superior court, with an information copy sent to the board of supervisors, on the findings <br />and recommendations pertaining to matters under the control of that county officer or <br />agency head and any agency or agencies which that officer or agency head supervises or <br />controls. In any city and county, the mayor shall also comment on the findings and <br />recommendations. <br />(a.)As to each Grand Jury fading, the responding person or entity shall indicate one of the <br />following: <br />(1) The respondent agrees with the finding. <br />(2) The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding, in which case the <br />response shall specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an <br />explanation of the reasons therefore. <br />(b.)As to each Grand Jury recommendation, the responding person or entity shall report one of <br />the following actions: <br />(1) The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the <br />implemented action. <br />(2) The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the <br />future, with a time frame for implementation. <br />(3) The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and <br />parameters of an analysis or study, and a time frame for the matter to be prepared for <br />2011-2012 ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY Page 221 <br />