Laserfiche WebLink
energy use. As such, the proposed Project is not <br />consistent with this measure and the Addendum <br />lacks substantial evidence to support its <br />consistency determination. <br />Require the use of energy -efficient lighting for all <br />Here, the while the Addendum states that the <br />street, parking, and area lighting <br />"project would use utilize energy -efficient LED <br />lighting," the Addendum and associated <br />documents fail to mention or specify that energy - <br />efficient lighting would be require for all street, <br />parking, and area lighting, as the measure states <br />(p. 3.5-3). As such, the proposed Project is not <br />consistent with this measure and the Addendum <br />lacks substantial evidence to support its <br />consistency determination. <br />Require the landscaping design for parking lots to <br />Here, the Addendum and associated documents <br />utilize tree cover and compost/mulch <br />fail to mention or require the landscaping design <br />for parking lots to utilize tree cover and <br />compost/mulch, as the measure indicates. As such, <br />the proposed Project is not consistent with this <br />measure and the Addendum lacks substantial <br />evidence to support its consistency determination. <br />Incorporate water retention in the design of <br />Here, the Addendum and associated documents <br />parking lots and landscaping, including using <br />fail to mention or incorporate water retention in <br />compost/mulch <br />the design of parking lots and landscaping, <br />including using compost/mulch. As such, the <br />proposed Project is not consistent with this <br />measure and the Addendum lacks substantial <br />evidence to support its consistency determination. <br />Require the development project to propose an <br />Here, the Addendum and associated documents <br />off -site mitigation project which should generate <br />fail to mention or require the Project to propose an <br />carbon credits equivalent to the anticipated GHG <br />off -site mitigation project to generate carbon <br />emission reductions. This would be implemented <br />credits, as required. As such, the proposed Project <br />via an approved protocol for carbon credits from <br />is not consistent with this measure and the <br />California Air Pollution Control Officers Association <br />Addendum lacks substantial evidence to support its <br />(CAPCOA), the California Air Resources Board, or <br />consistency determination. <br />other similar entities determined acceptable by the <br />local air district <br />Require the project to purchase carbon credits <br />Here, the Addendum and associated documents <br />from the CAPCOA GHG Reduction Exchange <br />fail to require the Project to purchase carbon <br />Program, American Carbon Registry (ACR), Climate <br />credits whatsoever. In addition, the Addendum and <br />Action Reserve (CAR) or other similar carbon credit <br />associated documents fail to mention the CAPCOA <br />registry determined to be acceptable by the local <br />GHG Reduction Exchange Program, ACR, CAR, or <br />air district <br />other similar carbon credit registries. As such, the <br />proposed Project is not consistent with this <br />measure and the Addendum lacks substantial <br />evidence to support its consistency determination. <br />29 <br />75C-104 <br />