Laserfiche WebLink
41h and Mortimer CEQA Addendum <br />October 12, 2020 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />The requirements of this Article shall apply to any new Residential Project <br />proposed in connection with an application to do any of the following: <br />(1) Increase the permitted residential density of the subject property above <br />the density permitted by applicable zoning at the time of the application. <br />The inclusionary requirement shall only apply to the incremental <br />increase in the number of units beyond that which is allowed by the <br />applicable zoning. <br />(2) Increase in the permitted residential density or percentage of residential <br />development allowed due to the City initiated zone changes after <br />November28, 2011." (Sec.41-1902(b)) <br />Block B of the Project is inconsistent with the zoning, massing and density allowed <br />by the current General Plan and Zoning. The UN-2 zoning allows single-family duplexes, <br />triplexes and quadraplexes, courtyard housing and rowhouses. UN-2 does not allow <br />"lined block buildings" such as proposed by the Project. (Addendum 2-11). The Project <br />exceeds the massing allowed in the UN-2 zone and therefore requires a variance from <br />section 41-2023 of the zoning code. In particular, UN-2 requires that floors 3-5 of a <br />building may cover no more than 85% of the ground floor, but the project proposes 100% <br />coverage. (Addendum 2-11). The Project exceeds the density allowed in UN-2. UN-2 <br />allows density of up to 50 dwelling units per acres, but the Project proposes 54 DU/acres. <br />(Addendum 3.6-5). For these reasons, the Project proposes to rezone the property from <br />UN-2 to Urban Center (UC). <br />Since the Project requires amendments to the zoning that will increase the <br />residential density allowed by the General Plan and Zoning code, the HOO applies to the <br />Project and the developer must be required to provide affordable housing. Since the <br />Project includes no affordable housing, it must be rejected by the City. <br />Richard Toshiyuki Drury <br />LOZEAU DRURY LLP <br />75C-284 <br />