My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75C - PH MORTIMER MIXED USE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
12/01/2020
>
75C - PH MORTIMER MIXED USE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2020 12:21:50 PM
Creation date
11/25/2020 12:09:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75C
Date
12/1/2020
Destruction Year
2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
483
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Santa Ana <br />4th and Mortimer Project <br />FEIR. With respect to Title 24, the project is required to comply with the standards set by the 2010 <br />FEIR to minimize the wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during <br />project operation. <br />Response 18 <br />The commenter states that, based on conclusions from Dr. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Matthew <br />Hagemann, C. Hg, P.G. of the environmental consulting firm SWAPE, the Addendum's air quality <br />analysis is flawed due to unsubstantiated input parameters used estimate the project's air quality <br />emissions. The commenter adds that SWAPE concluded that the project would create a cancer risk <br />from airborne pollution of up to 210 per million — over 20 times above the SCAQMD significance <br />threshold of 10 per million. The commenter states that SWAPE also calculated significance <br />greenhouse gas impacts associated with the project. The commenter concludes that the Addendum <br />fails to implement all feasible mitigation measures to reduce the project's air quality emissions and <br />adds that an EIR is required to analyze and mitigate the project's significant air quality and <br />greenhouse gas emissions impacts. <br />According to the Air Quality Assessment conducted for the project, which is included as Appendix B <br />to the Addendum, emissions were modeled using the California Emissions Estimator Model version <br />2016.2.3 (CalEEMod). CalEEMod is a Statewide land use emissions computer model designed to <br />quantify potential criteria pollutant emissions associated with both construction and operations <br />from a variety of land use projects. Air quality impacts were adequately assessed according to <br />methodologies recommended by CARB and the SCAQMD. Regulatory measures that apply to the <br />project include compliance with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 (prohibition of nuisances, watering of <br />inactive and perimeter areas, track out requirements, etc.) and SCAQMD Rule 1113 (low -Volatile <br />Organic Compound paint) and were included in CalEEMod. Furthermore, the air quality and <br />greenhouse gas emissions associated with the project and reported in the Addendum conservatively <br />do not take credit for the emissions currently associated with the existing uses that would be <br />removed. <br />As discussed in the Air Quality Assessment and Section 3.2, Air Quality, of the Addendum, <br />construction would result in the generation of diesel particulate matter (DPM) emissions from the <br />use of off -road diesel equipment. The amount to which the receptors are exposed (a function of <br />concentration and duration of exposure) is the primary factor used to determine health risk (i.e., <br />potential exposure to Toxic Air Contaminant [TAC] emission levels that exceed applicable <br />standards). Health -related risks associated with diesel -exhaust emissions are primarily linked to <br />long-term exposure and the associated risk of contracting cancer. The use of diesel trucks would be <br />most prevalent during the temporary construction period of the project rather than during <br />operation of the project. Current models and methodologies for conducting health risk assessments <br />are associated with longer -term exposure periods of 9, 30, and 70 years, which do not correlate well <br />with the temporary and highly variable nature of construction activities. DPM emissions from the <br />21-month construction period of the project would represent a range of 2.5 to 19.4 percent of the <br />typical exposure duration used in health risk assessments. The closest sensitive receptors are <br />located adjacent to the site, approximately 55 feet from the project site boundary. Project <br />construction involves phased activities in several areas across the site and the project would not <br />require the extensive use of heavy-duty equipment or diesel trucks in any one location over the <br />duration of construction, which would limit the exposure of any proximate individual sensitive <br />receptor to TACs. The project would not result in a significant cancer risk from airborne pollution. As <br />such, Section 3, Environmental Impact Analysis, of the Addendum supports the conclusion that <br />75C-294 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.