Laserfiche WebLink
CITY REVIEW AND RESPONSE12•Response to Assertion 1: Addendum is the appropriate CEQA document; No substantial evidence that the project will have new environmental impacts not analyzed in the 2010 EIR related to indoor air quality impacts, air quality and greenhouse gas impacts, or cultural resources•Response to Assertion 2: HOO does not apply to the project because the project does not exceed the residential density permitted in the general plan•Response to Assertion 3: All written and verbal comments were presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing and were considered prior to their decision. The applicant did not provide any evidence substantiating this assertion. Further, consideration of a public comment letter received does not constitute decision or requirement taken by the Planning Commission