Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No. 2020-xx <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />associated costs are beyond the typical range of cost experienced by <br />most developers of single-family residences in Santa Ana. <br />2. That the granting of a minor exception is necessary for the <br />preservation and enjoyment of one or more substantial property <br />rights. <br />The granting of the minor exception is necessary for the preservation <br />and enjoyment of substantial property rights. The granting of the <br />minor exception will preserve the property owner’s ability to complete <br />construction of a new single-family residence and accessory dwelling <br />unit and to provide power to the new residential units and for the <br />enjoyment of future occupants. <br />3. That the granting of a minor exception will not be materially <br />detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property. <br />The granting of this minor exception will not be detrimental to the <br />public or surrounding properties. There is an existing overhead feeder <br />that currently provides electrical service to the subject site. <br />Additionally, the temporary power is also being drawn from the same <br />pole. Continuing to provide overhead service will alleviate the need to <br />trench through two residential properties that the property owner does <br />not control. Additionally, temporarily closing West Walnut Street to <br />allow construction and trenching would create traffic and <br />inconveniences to the surrounding residents and the general public. <br />Approving this minor exception to allow the overhead electrical feeder <br />will not have any negative impacts to the surrounding properties or <br />the welfare of the general public and will be the most feasible option <br />for the applicant, Southern California Edison (SCE) as the electric <br />utility provider, and the City. <br />4. That the granting of a minor exception will not adversely affect the <br />General Plan of the City. <br />The project will not adversely affect the General Plan, as the <br />proposed minor exception is consistent with Goals 1, 2 and 3 of the <br />Land Use Element of the General Plan. These goals encourage the <br />development and occupation of single-family residences. Policy 1.4 <br />supports the development of single-family residential lots, Policy 2.10 <br />supports new development which is harmonious in scale and <br />character with existing development in the area, Policy 3.1 supports <br />development which provides a positive contribution to neighborhood <br />character and identity, and Policy 3.5 encourages new development <br />and/or additions to existing development that are compatible in scale, <br />and consistent with the architectural style and character of the <br />neighborhood. The project satisfies all of these General Plan goals <br />and policies.