Laserfiche WebLink
Informational Report: Police Oversight Mechanisms <br />December 15, 2020 <br />Page 2 <br />United States'. Police oversight mechanisms in the United States operate in a variety of political <br />and socioeconomic environments and exhibit variation in terms of their formal authority, level of <br />professionalization, staffing, budgetary authority, and style of oversight. They are often created <br />through a local government ordinance or an amendment to the local government charter" <br />The simplest police oversight mechanisms consist of board of citizens that can review the findings <br />of investigations conducted by the police agency's internal affairs division. Such police oversight <br />mechanisms often have little or no budgetary authority, with the board of citizens serving on a <br />volunteer basis. More organizationally complex police oversight mechanisms may include a paid <br />full-time staff of lawyers, investigators, and policy analysts that report to the citizen board. Such <br />police oversight mechanisms often have substantial budgetary authority, the ability to conduct <br />independent investigations into citizen complaints, and access to police evidence records and <br />electronic databases. The methodology for the appointment of citizen participants often varies <br />across jurisdictions. <br />NACOLE's Classifications of Police Oversight <br />The September 15, 2020 informational report also shared NACOLE's three classifications of police <br />oversight: <br />Investigation -focused model: involves routine, independent investigations of complaints <br />against police officers, which may replace or duplicate police internal affairs processes, <br />staffed by non -police civilian investigators. <br />Review -focused model: concentrates on commenting on completed investigations after <br />reviewing the quality of police internal affairs investigations. Recommendations may be <br />made to police executives regarding findings, or there may be a request that further <br />investigations be conducted. A review board composed of citizen volunteers commonly <br />heads this model, and they may hold public meetings to collect community input, and <br />facilitate police -community communication. <br />Auditor/monitor model: focuses on examining broad patterns in complaint investigations <br />including patterns in the quality of investigations, findings, and discipline rendered. Further, <br />in some cities that use this model, auditor/monitors may actively participate in or monitor <br />open internal investigations. This model often seeks to promote broad organizational <br />change by conducting systematic reviews of police policies, practices or training, and <br />making recommendations for improvement. <br />Police Oversight Models with Investigatory Powers <br />A 2001 report published by the U.S. Department of Justice's National Institute of Justice provides <br />the following summary to describe police oversight with investigatory or subpoena powers: <br />This model consists of assigned members who have the additional authority to investigate <br />complaints separately and externally from the police department. This model is generally seen in <br />organizations who have a history of serious patterns and practices of misconduct. The board or <br />65D-2 <br />