My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75A
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
12/15/2020
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/3/2021 4:23:17 PM
Creation date
12/15/2020 11:00:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
12/15/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
We need that people are hired that are not at war with most of Santa Ana's homegrown, activist and <br />progressive community. <br />Since the Downtown BIDS were set up wrongfully as detailed in the attached Grand Jury Report, suffered <br />through severe dysfunction in its first decade and is still limping onward, why don't we take this <br />opportunity to curb some massive spending and review this whole situation? <br />Before you re -fund the BID, I ask that you: <br />• conduct an Audit and Investigation of Downtown Inc/SABC to determine whether they are <br />using City Resources and Money to benefit primarily their own board members, leadership and <br />associates <br />• recommend that a new RFP is drafted, with the input of business -owners (as opposed to <br />property -owners) and representatives from Santa Ana's diverse neighborhoods <br />• enact Conflict of interest guidelines for future BIDS so that equity is ensured with public <br />monies, as opposed to self -funded owner -initiatives and commercial districts <br />With these measures taken, I know that not only Santa Ana's downtown will benefit, but the City as a <br />whole. I would be happy to discuss this matter further, if you have any questions or to connect you with <br />my colleagues in the BID, Booster, Public Event and P1aceMaking field. <br />A also urge the City Council to review the Grand Jury Report, to determine if the concerns identified in it <br />are still in effect today. <br />Keep up the great work! <br />Sincerely, <br />--- Victor Payan <br />I have attached the 2011-2012 OC Grand Jury report section on the Santa Ana's Property -Based improvement <br />District to facilitate your review. <br />Additionally, below is the summary of findings and recommendations from the report: <br />FINDINGS: <br />In accordance with California Penal Code §933 and §933.05, the 2011-2012 Orange County Grand Jury <br />requires responses from each agency affected by the Findings/Conclusions presented in this section. The <br />responses are to be submitted to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court. <br />Based on its study of the Santa Ana Property Based Improvement District, the 2011-2012 Orange County Grand <br />Jury makes the following Findings/Conclusions: <br />F1. City of Santa Ana appears to be in violation of California State Law in the formation of this Improvement <br />District. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.