My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - #1
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
02/12/2021 Special
>
Correspondence - #1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2021 4:19:28 PM
Creation date
2/16/2021 4:19:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
2/12/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – The Brown Act permits legislative bodies to discuss certain matters without <br />members of the public present. The City Council finds, based on advice from the City Attorney, that discussion in <br />open session of the following matters will prejudice the position of the City in existing and anticipated litigation: <br />1.PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION – (Consideration of goals and objectives in <br />relation to work plan evaluation criteria) <br />Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 <br />Title: City Manager <br />Name <br />Mike Tardif <br />Comment 02/11/2021 12:57 PM : (Against) <br />Ms. Carvalho, <br />Thank you for your clarification of the Council closed session agenda item. <br />However, the agenda description which was emailed to the public is considerably <br />different than your case description of the permissible area discussion. <br />“..may also include consideration of the criteria for such evaluation, consideration of <br />the process for conducting the evaluation, and other preliminary matters, to the <br />extent those matters constitute an exercise of the legislative body’s discretion in <br />evaluating a particular employee…” <br />“City Council will meet in a closed session special meeting to develop City <br />Manager performance expectations and discuss future goals and priorities for <br />the City’s chief executive.” <br />In particular to “discuss future goals and priorities for the City’s chief executive” <br />could stray into areas other than “the process for conducting the evaluation, and <br />other preliminary matters ..” <br />I trust that you, or your representative, as City Council Attorney will endeavor to <br />keep the Council closed session confined to a strictly Brown Act compliant area of <br />discussion. <br />Regards, <br />Mike Tardif <br />Santa Ana
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.