My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - #30
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
03/02/2021 Regular
>
Correspondence - #30
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2021 3:42:40 PM
Creation date
3/1/2021 3:12:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
30
Date
3/2/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> 2 Park Plaza, Suite 100 | Irvine, CA 92614| P 949.476.2242 | F 949.476.0443 | www.ocbc.org <br /> <br /> <br />March 2, 2021 <br /> <br />The Honorable Vicente Sarmiento <br />Mayor <br />City of Santa Ana <br />20 Civic Center Plaza <br />Santa Ana, CA 92701 <br /> <br />RE: Santa Ana Premium Pay for Grocery Workers OPPOSE <br /> <br />Dear Mayor Sarmiento and Members of the City Council: <br /> <br />Orange County Business Council (OCBC), the leading voice of business in Orange County, is a <br />strong advocate for balancing support for workers with relief for businesses also reeling from the <br />pandemic. A premium pay ordinance for grocery workers will impose financial harm on employers <br />at the worst possible time, while also unintentionally damaging workers and ultimately consumers <br />and residents. Therefore, OCBC again expresses our strong opposition to a local mandate <br />requiring premium pay for any workers and asks the City Council to work with stakeholders <br />to assess the full economic impacts and explore alternatives. <br /> <br />Local grocery stores, pharmacies, retailers and other essential employers are committed to paying <br />competitive wages and benefits to their employees. Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, they <br />have invested significantly in infrastructure and enhanced safety protocols to protect frontline <br />essential workers and shoppers. They have also provided incentive pay, bonuses and additional <br />health benefits. According to an economic study released by the California Grocers Association, up <br />to an additional $5/hour increase in pay could raise grocery prices by about $400 annually for the <br />typical family of four at the worst possible time. <br /> <br />A hazard pay ordinance could also harm workers, rather than help them. The economic study <br />concluded that, if grocers must offset savings in operational costs, they would need to reduce work <br />hours by 24 percent across the board. Higher costs could even force employers to shutter store <br />locations. Shutting down grocery stores will result in increased food insecurity and food deserts, <br />especially in low-income and disadvantaged neighborhoods. Furthermore, higher costs will <br />ultimately be borne by consumers and community members in the form of increased prices, at a time <br />when many families and residents are already economically burdened. <br /> <br />A hazard pay ordinance for any industry should consider research and cannot be duplicative or <br />rushed. For these reasons, OCBC opposes a premium pay ordinance and strongly urges the <br />Council to reevaluate this impactful policy. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Jennifer Ward <br />Senior Vice President of Advocacy and Government Affairs <br />THE LEADING VOICE OF BUSINESS IN ORANGE COUNTY <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.