My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - #30
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
03/02/2021 Regular
>
Correspondence - #30
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2021 3:42:40 PM
Creation date
3/1/2021 3:12:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
30
Date
3/2/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Consumer and Community Impacts of Hazard Pay Mandates <br />Executive Summary <br />Hazard -pay mandates passed in the City of Long Beach and under consideration in the City of Los <br />Angeles and in other local jurisdictions would raise pay for grocery workers by as much as $5.00 per <br />hour. Since the average pay for grocery workers in California is currently about $18.00 per hour, a <br />$5.00 increase would raise store labor costs by 28 percent, and have major negative impacts on <br />grocery stores, their employees and their customers. Specifically: <br />Average profit margins in the grocery industry were 1.4% in 2019, with a significant number <br />of stores operating with net losses. While profits increased temporarily to 2.2% during early <br />to mid 2020, quarterly data indicates that profit margins were subsiding to historical levels as <br />2020 drew to a close. <br />Wage -related labor expenses account for about 16 percent of total sales in the grocery <br />industry. As a result, a 28 percent increase in wages would boost overall costs 4.5 percent <br />under the City of Los Angeles proposal of $5.00 per hour. This increase would be twice the size <br />of the 2020 industry profit margin and three times historical grocery profit margins. <br />In order to survive such an increase, grocers would need to raise prices to consumers and/or <br />find substantial offsetting cuts to their controllable operating expenses, which would mean <br />workforce reductions. As an illustration of the potential magnitude of each of these impacts, <br />we considered two extremes: <br />1) All of the higher wage costs (assuming the $5.00/hour proposal) are passed through to <br />consumers in the form of higher retail prices: <br />• This would result in a $400 per year increase in grocery costs for a typical family of <br />four, an increase of 4.5 percent. <br />• If implemented in the City of Los Angeles, its residents would pay $450 million more <br />for groceries over a year. <br />• The increase would hit low- and moderate -income families hard, particularly those <br />struggling with job losses and income reductions due to COVID-19. <br />• If implemented statewide, additional grocery costs would be $4.5 billion per year in <br />California. <br />2) Retail prices to consumers are not raised and all the additional costs are offset through a <br />reduction in store expenses: <br />• Given that labor costs are by far the largest controllable expense for stores, it is <br />highly likely that the wage mandates will translate into fewer store hours, fewer <br />employee hours, and fewer jobs. <br />➢ For a store with 50 full-time equivalent employees, it would take a reduction of <br />11 employees to offset the increased wage costs, or a 22% decrease in staff. <br />➢ If the mandate were imposed statewide at $5.00 per hour, the job loss would be <br />66,000 workers. <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.