Laserfiche WebLink
Consumer and Community Impacts of Hazard Pay Mandates <br />Higher costs passed along to consumers <br />Aggregate impacts. If a $5.00 per hour wage increase were imposed statewide and all of the <br />increase were passed along to customers in the form of higher product prices, Californians would <br />face a rise in food costs of $4.5 billion annually. If imposed locally, the City of Los Angeles's $5 per <br />hour proposal would raise costs to its residents by $450 million annually, and the $4.00 per hour <br />increase in Long Beach would raise grocery costs to its residents by about $40 million annually." <br />Impact on household budgets. The wage increase would add about $400 to the annual cost of food <br />and housing supplies for the typical family of four in California.12 While such an increase may be <br />absorbable in higher income households, it would hit low- and moderate -income households <br />especially hard. The impact would be particularly harsh for those who have experienced losses of <br />income and jobs due to the pandemic, or for those living on a fixed retirement income including <br />many seniors. For these households, the additional grocery -related expenses will make it much <br />more difficult to cover costs for other necessities such as rent, transportation, utilities, and <br />healthcare. <br />According to the BLS Consumer Expenditure Survey, California households with annual incomes of <br />up to $45,000 already spend virtually all of their income on necessities, such as food, housing, <br />healthcare, transportation and clothing.13 For many of these households, a $33 per month increase <br />in food costs would push them into a deficit. <br />These increases would add to the severe economic losses that many Californians have experienced <br />as a result of government -mandated shutdowns in response to COVID-19. According to a recent <br />survey by the Public Policy Institute of California, 44 percent of households with incomes under <br />$20,000 per year and 40 percent with incomes between $20,000 and $40,000 have reduced meals or <br />cut back on food to save money.14 Clearly, imposing a $4.5 billion increase in grocery prices would <br />make matters worse, especially for these lower -income Californians. <br />Higher costs are offset by job and hours -worked reductions <br />If grocers were not able to pass along the higher costs resulting from the additional $5/hour wage <br />requirement, they would be forced to cut other costs to avoid incurring financial losses.ls Given <br />"Our estimates start with national U.S. Census Bureau estimates from the Annual Retail Trade Survey for 2018 (the most <br />current data available), which indicates that nationwide sales by grocers (excluding convenience stores) was $634 billion <br />in 2018. We then apportioned this national data to California as well as the cities of Los Angeles and Long Beach based on <br />relative populations and per -household expenditure data from the Consumer Expenditure Survey. We then updated the <br />2018 estimate to 2021 based on actual increases in grocery -related spending between 2018 and 2020, as reported by the <br />U.S. Department of Commerce, and a projection of modest growth in 2021. Our estimate is consistent with the industry <br />estimate of $82.9 billion for 2019 that was by IBISWorld, as adjusted for industry growth in 2020 and 2021. (See <br />IBISWORLD Industry Report, Supermarkets & Grocery Stores in California, Tanvi Kumar, February 2019.) <br />12 Capitol Matrix Consulting estimate based on U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Expenditure Report, 2019. <br />htts: www.bts.gov/o12ub /rel2orts/consumer-exi2enditures /2019 /home.htm <br />13 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Expenditure Survey, State -Level Expenditure Tables by Income. <br />https://www.bts.gov/cex/csxresearchtabtes.htm#stateincome. <br />14 "Californians and Their Well -Being", a survey by the Public Policy Institute of California. December 2020. <br />https: //www.ppic. org/publication/ppic-statewide-s urvey-catifornians-and-their-eco no mic-well-b eing-december-2 0 2 0 / <br />is Circumstances where stores would not be able to pass forward high costs include communities where customers are <br />financially squeezed by pandemic -related losses in jobs or wages, or where the increased is imposed locallyand customers <br />are able to avoid higher prices by shifting purchases to cross -border stores. <br />9 <br />