Correspondence - #30 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

March 1, 2021 The Honorable Vicente Sarmiento Mayor, City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 RE: Grocery Worker Premium Pay Dear Mayor Sarmiento, 1 cga On behalf of Santa Ana grocers, I write to ask the Council to not move forward with the proposed grocery worker premium pay ordinance given the numerous negative consequences to grocery workers, neighborhoods and the grocery industry. Based on the consequences experienced in otherjurisdictions with similar ordinances, we must oppose the ordinance for both policy and legal reasons. We agree that grocery workers serve a vital and essential role during the pandemic. They have worked tirelessly to keep stores open for consumers, allowing our communities to have uninterrupted access to food and medications. To protect our employees, grocery stores were among the first to implement numerous safety protocols, including providing PPE and masks, performing wellness checks, enhancing sanitation and cleaning, limiting store capacity, and instituting social distance requirements, among other actions. On top of increased safety measures, grocery employees have also received unprecedented amounts of supplemental paid leave to care for themselves and theirfamilies in addition to already existing leave benefits. Grocers have also provided employees additional pay and benefits throughout the pandemic in various forms, including hourly and bonus pay averaging an extra $2 to $3 along with significant discounts and complimentary groceries. All of these safety efforts and additional benefits clearly demonstrate grocers' dedication and appreciation for their employees. Most importantly the industry has been fierce advocates for grocery workers to be prioritized for vaccinations. This is evident now that Riverside County is now considering grocery workers a priority and they are currently receiving the vaccine. Unfortunately, the Grocery Worker Premium Pay ordinance would mandate grocery stores provide additional pay beyond what is economically feasible, which would severely impact store viability and result in increased prices for groceries, limited operating hours, reduced hours forworkers, fewer workers per store, and most concerning, possible store closures. These negative impacts from the ordinance would be felt most acutely by independent grocers, ethnic format stores, and stores serving low-income neighborhoods. The Cities of Long Beach and Seattle, who have passed a similar ordinance, have already suffered the permanent loss of several full -service grocery stores as direct result. We request the City of Santa Ana perform an economic impact report to understand the true impacts of this policy. If you choose not to understand specific impacts for Santa Ana, then we referyou to the economic impact report from the City of Los Angeles Legislative Analyst Office. This report makes it clear that the impact of this policy will severely impact workers, consumers, and grocery stores. In its own words the Los Angeles City Legislative Analyst clearly states that grocery "companies would be required to take action to reduce costs or increase revenue as the labor increase will eliminate all current profit margin." The report recognizes that "affected companies could raise prices to counteract the additional wage cost" This type of ordinance would put "more pressure on struggling stores (especially independent grocers) which could lead to store closures" and that "the closure of stores could lead to an increase in 'food deserts' that lack access to fresh groceries" These are all scenarios we know everyone in the city wants to avoid, especially during a pandemic. This is why we are asking the Council to not move forward with this policy and, instead, focus on making sure all grocery workers are provided the vaccine. CALIFORNIA GROCERS ASSOCIATION 11005 12th Street, Suite 200, Sacramento, CA 95814 P: (916) 448-3545 1 F: (916) 448-2793 1 www.cagrocers.com