My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - #24
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
05/18/2021 Regular
>
Correspondence - #24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2021 11:31:40 AM
Creation date
5/18/2021 8:34:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
5/18/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Orozco, Norma <br />From:Manuel Escamilla <manueljescamilla@gmail.com> <br />Sent:Tuesday, May 18, 2021 1:47 PM <br />To:eComment <br />Subject:Item 24. Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Workshop Session <br />Dear Mayor and Council, <br /> <br />Regarding tonight's budget discussion. The American Rescue Plan is an opportunity for transformative <br />investments that will help the City reach the long term goal of efficiently delivering services within a sustainable <br />budget. <br /> <br />The language of the American Rescue Plan’s Interim Final Rule indicates that <br /> <br />“\[T\]hese resources lay the foundation for a strong, equitable economic recovery...by addressing the <br />systemic public health and economic challenges that may have contributed to more severe impacts of <br />the pandemic among low-income communities and people of color.” <br /> <br />To this end I have listed below 6 items that I believe are worth considering. <br /> <br />1. Public Banking Study & Seed Funding <br />The City should conduct a feasibility study to identify ways in which Santa Ana might benefit from the creation <br />of or joining with a publicly owned municipal bank. Potential benefits include the elimination of existing bank <br />fees, increased local access to start-up capital, the ability to loan funding gaps for development proposals that <br />meet local public benefit thresholds, and other targeted investments reflecting the City’s priorities. <br /> <br />2. Communication infrastructure - Constituent Management Service or other equivalent software to CRM <br />programs used in the private sector to centralize communication across the agency. Contact information, <br />language preference, and record of contact among specific groups remains scattered and unorganized. Each <br />time a staff member leaves or retires, their network of contacts is effectively lost to the City and must be <br />rebuilt. <br /> <br />https://civicrm.org/cs/new-york-state-senates-bluebird Project Blue Bird from the NY Senate is an open source <br />example of this type of software. <br /> <br />3. Per acre parcel analysis of tax revenue. The City should invest in a more detailed understanding of how <br />much different properties bring in revenues and incur costs to the budget. This analysis can be done by adding <br />the locally allocated portion of local property taxes divided by sq footage of each parcel to individualized sales <br />tax data available from CDA. <br /> <br />Additional analysis would look for correlations between land use types, allowable density, tenure type, and <br />other factors to identify any statistical patterns that the City may be able to address using its land use <br />authority. <br /> <br />4. Beginning effort to revise the Midtown Specific Plan (North Main) and potential Civic Center <br />revitalization efforts. The Midtown Plan remains the most difficult to read, inflexible, and out of date area plan <br />within the City. It does not accurately reflect the Council's current support for adaptive reuse, supporting an <br />active street life, and serving as a connection between Downtown and Main Place. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.