My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - #15
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
05/18/2021 Regular
>
Correspondence - #15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2021 11:15:25 AM
Creation date
5/19/2021 11:15:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
5/18/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Orozco, Norma <br />From:Hayley Gilbert <municipalityluv@gmail.com> <br />Sent:Tuesday, May 18, 2021 5:11 PM <br />To:Penaloza, David; eComment; Lopez, Jessie; Hernandez, Johnathan; Bacerra, Phil; Phan, <br />Thai; Sarmiento, Vicente <br />Subject:5-18-21 REQUEST TO DISCUSS - City council Item 15 <br />Good evening, <br /> <br />After reading the report for Item 15 for grant services, what procurement method was used? Did the City find a <br />grant expert, or go with a request for proposals for these services? <br /> <br />The staff report does not discuss public work’s efforts selecting this candidate and I am concerned it was sole <br />source rather than finding the best candidate fairly. If I am correct, the city has had rotating consultants <br />preparing grant services and with an agency that is mostly grant funded, why the permanent deficiency? <br /> <br />Please pull this item for discussion and if needed, postpone this vote until more information is available to the <br />public. <br /> <br />-Resident near Cabrillo <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.