ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, TUSTIN CITY OF. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CITY OF

Home Browse Search

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-1-3289 1 (50%) by the CITY of Santa Ana and fifty percent (50%) by CITY of Fountain Valley. 2 2. Red Hill Avenue and Warner Avenue: This intersection is shared with the 3 CITY of Tustin. The CITY of Santa Ana shall monitor the Red Hill Avenue and 4 Warner Avenue intersection every two (2) years, and shall provide the monitoring 5 results to the CITY of Tustin. Monitoring shall begin two (2) years after the MOU is 6 executed. Prior to the ICU LOS at the intersection of Red Hill Avenue and 7 Warner Avenue exceeding the pre -amendment to the MPAH ICU LOS of 0.88, D the 8 CITY of Santa Ana shall fund the cost of the Red Hill Avenue and Warner Avenue 9 improvement. 10 G. The CITY of Santa Ana shall maintain funding availability, for a minimum of ten (10) years, 11 to contribute their fair share cost allocation to the agency leading the mitigation improvement, as identified 12 in Exhibit D, at the State Route (SR)-55 Northbound Ramps/Del Amo Avenue and Newport Avenue 13 intersection. The CITY of Santa Ana shall incorporate cost changes, which may include cost changes 14 based on the California Construction Cost Index or the County of Orange's assessment of land value, at 15 the time of mitigation improvement implementation. This funding shall be provided to the agency leading 16 and implementing the improvement at this intersection. 17 H. The CITY of Santa Ana shall provide status reports to AUTHORITY on the progress of is the cooperative transit study and subsequent implementation of transit improvements and strategies, per 19 Article 4 Subsections C and D, every odd year through the MPAH Certification Review Process of the 20 Measure M2 Eligibility Submittal. 21 ARTICLE 5. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY: 22 The CITY of Fountain Valley agrees to the following responsibilities: 23 A. The CITY of Fountain Valley enters into this MOU to implement mitigation improvement(s) 24 at the Euclid Street and Edinger Avenue intersection, as identified in Exhibit D. The improvement(s) is 25 not meant to be prescriptive. If an alternative improvement, which meets the overall objective of achieving 26 and/or maintaining the pre -amendment to the MPAH ICU, is identified then that improvement shall be considered acceptable and shall be implemented as a substituted solution if there is agreement amongst Page 9 of 16