My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, TUSTIN CITY OF. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CITY OF
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
O
>
ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (OCTA)
>
ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, TUSTIN CITY OF. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CITY OF
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2021 2:46:25 PM
Creation date
5/20/2021 2:35:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, TUSTIN CITY OF. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CITY OF
Contract #
A-2020-211
Agency
Public Works
Council Approval Date
11/17/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Amendments to the Master Plan of Arterial Highways Page 5 <br />Furthermore, potential impacts to high -quality transit corridors were identified. <br />OCTA provides high -frequency (15-minute service intervals) fixed -route bus <br />service during peak commute hours on two segments that are part of the MPAH <br />amendment - McFadden Avenue (Route 66) and 1st Street (Route 64). <br />The City's proposal would remove existing and planned travel lanes to <br />incorporate complete streets infrastructure. OCTA and City staff agreed that <br />additional mitigation measures on these corridors are necessary to maintain or <br />improve transit service performance. <br />An MOU was prepared to define the roles and responsibilities of the parties the <br />mitigations for the proposed MPAH amendment (Attachment D). Currently, the <br />City and the affected agencies are in agreement on a draft mitigation program. <br />For the impacts located at the cities of Fountain Valley and Tustin, the City has <br />agreed to pay, at minimum, their fair share cost of the mitigation measures. The <br />proposed reclassification on Fairhaven Avenue, between Grand Avenue and <br />Tustin Avenue, is shared with the City of Orange. For this reclassification on <br />Fairhaven Avenue to become final, both the cities of Orange and Santa Ana will <br />need to update their circulation elements. The reclassification results in an <br />impact at the Tustin Avenue and Fairhaven Avenue intersection (City of Orange). <br />The existing intersection can accommodate the proposed reclassification to a <br />divided collector (two-lane, divided) arterial, and therefore, the City of Orange <br />has requested not be a party to the MOU. Lastly, the City has also agreed to <br />fund a cooperative study, led by OCTA. The study will identify feasible transit <br />improvements for impacts on high -quality transit corridors. Roles and <br />responsibilities for funding and implementation would be identified and <br />coordinated with OCTA as well. The affected agencies have reviewed the TIS, <br />addressed remaining questions with the City, and all have provided letters of <br />support for the City's amendment request (attachments E, F, and G). <br />The City also shared the TIS with immediately adjacent agencies - the cities of <br />Costa Mesa, Garden Grove, Irvine, Westminster, the County of Orange, <br />and the California Department of Transportation. Except for the City of <br />Garden Grove (Garden Grove), all immediately adjacent agencies have <br />indicated their support for the City's amendment request (attachments H, I, J, K, <br />and L). Garden Grove is the owner of the Willowick Golf Course property, which <br />is near the proposed Hazard Avenue reclassification. Garden Grove would like <br />to preserve existing vehicular access in the vicinity of the Willowick property <br />while the City and Garden Grove solidify a vision for the property. Currently, the <br />property remains classified as open space in the City's proposed Land Use <br />Element Update. Moreover, the TIS did not identify any impacts in the vicinity of <br />Hazard Avenue, and it is projected to operate at a segment link level of <br />service "A" in the future year with reclassification. Therefore, there are no <br />technical MPAH-related issues with the proposed reclassification to <br />Hazard Avenue. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.