Correspondence - Non-Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

In fact, the most recent edition of the City of Santa Ana's Designated Tree Species Guide (March 2021) issued by the PWA, states the following policies: • It is the City of Santa Ana's Tree Removal Policy to deny removal of any tree on the City's Designated Species list and to make repairs to the hardscape. • It is the City of Santa Ana's Tree Removal Policy to deny removal of any tree species that is not on the City of Santa Ana Designated Species list and not causing significant infrastructure damage. • It is the City of Santa Ana's Tree Removal Policy to approve removal of any tree species that is not in the City of Santa Ana Designated Species Guide and causing significant infrastructure damage and to make repairs to the hardscape. • It is the City of Santa Ana's Tree Removal Policy to remove a tree if it is dead, diseased beyond repair or a hazard to the public. • It is the City of Santa Ana's Tree Removal Policy to place a notice on any tree that is approved for removal by the policy prior to scheduling removal. • It is the City of Santa Ana's Tree Removal Policy to bring appeals to this policy to the Environmental Transportation and Advisory Commission for their decision. Since the Canary Island Pines are listed in the Designated Tree Species Guide, the City through the PWA, should have been informed of and should have denied the removal of these trees on city property by SCE. Furthermore, since SCE did not seek or get city approval to remove the trees, the city should fine SCE appropriately, not only for the value of the trees that were removed, but also impose a punitive fine for not seeking city approval. In the budget for the 2019-20 fiscal year, Santa Ana spent over $4 million on an urban forest. If Santa Ana wishes to be known as a Tree City and a supporter of the environment, it should monitor the city-wide destruction of trees by SCE as well as many home owners, encouraging the protection and maintenance of local trees. We recommend that the city's Climate Action Plan of 2015 be updated and include a public and private role in creating a healthy urban forest in Santa Ana. A robust tree canopy reduces carbons, provides shade and cover in high temperatures, and adds to the beauty and values of our communities. We welcome further communication regarding our requests and collaboration with the city s tree projects. We can arrange a virtual or in -person contact with the council at your/their convenience. Respectfully Submitted, Rev. Susan Chamberlain, President, OC Interfaith Coalition for the Environment, OCICE Margo Finlayson, Co -Chair, Climate Reality, Orange County Ca. Chapter Vladimir Goren, President, People and Trees, Santa Ana, Ca. Virginia Bernal, Citizens' Climate Lobby, Santa Ana, Ca. Chapter Ed Mauer, Rep., Sierra Sage, Sierra Club OC Larry Mein, former ETAC Commissioner, Ward 3 Tristan Miller, Vice -Chair, Climate Reality, OC, Ca. / S.A. Ward 3 resident