My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Pension Liability Policy #21
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
02/02/2021 Regular and Special
>
Pension Liability Policy #21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2021 1:56:06 PM
Creation date
7/14/2021 1:56:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
UNFUNDED EMPLOYEE PENSION LIABILITY COST REDUCTION POLICY Page 2 <br /> <br />2. Refinance the liability, which is a legal debt of the City, at a lower interest rate. <br /> <br /> <br />Within these two basic strategies, there are a variety of options and associated risks. <br /> <br />Application of Additional Discretionary Payments <br />When the City identifies funding for an Additional Discretionary Payment (ADP), there is a strategy to apply the ADP <br />to the unfunded pension liability. <br /> <br />The unfunded liability is comprised of layers or “bases” related to each year of actual plan results. Each base is <br />either a loss or gain. CalPERS amortizes most of the bases over twenty years to calculate the annual required <br />contribution to reduce the liability. Loss bases at the beginning of an amortization cycle are desirable targets for <br />an ADP to maximize overall savings. Conversely, loss bases at the end of an amortization cycle are desirable targets <br />to maximize short‐term savings. <br /> <br />1. It shall be the City’s policy to use a targeting strategy, and apply any Additional Discretionary Payments to <br />loss bases at the beginning of an amortization cycle to maximize overall savings. <br /> <br />Use Accumulated Fund Balance or One‐Time Money <br />The City has a General Fund to account for unrestricted revenue; and many other “restricted” funds to account for <br />revenue with spending restrictions imposed by law, other governmental agencies, or legally enforceable <br />agreements. The City allocates its unfunded pension liability to each fund based upon the prior year normal cost <br />charged to the fund through payroll. <br /> <br />When the City receives more revenue than expected, or spends less than budgeted, a fund balance accumulates. <br />Much like spending from a savings account, accumulated fund balance is a one‐time resource the City can use to <br />pay down a fund’s allocation of the unfunded pension liability. The City has a separate “reserve” policy to establish <br />the minimum fund balance to keep on hand for emergencies and operational cash flow. <br /> <br />2. It shall be the City’s policy to consider an additional discretionary payment to reduce the unfunded pension <br />liability during each annual budget process, when staff identifies accumulated fund balance in excess of <br />reserve policy requirements. <br /> <br />Negotiate with Employees <br />Employees are already required to contribute a portion of their pay to the employee pension plan. Even though <br />the City collects the employee contribution from the employee, the City reports the employee contribution to <br />CalPERS as an employer‐paid contribution. This increases the employee income used to calculate the City’s <br />contribution and the retiree benefit. <br /> <br />The City may negotiate with its labor groups to require larger contribution from employees, or to stop reporting the <br />employee contribution as employer‐paid. Both options would reduce the City’s normal cost contribution, and may <br />be difficult to negotiate without offering something in exchange. <br /> <br />3. It shall be the City’s policy to propose reductions of the City’s normal cost contribution during labor <br />negotiations, based upon the plan funding ratio and the City’s current and forecasted financial position. <br /> <br />Use Cash Planned for Capital Projects and Issue Tax‐Exempt Debt <br />When the City has cash on hand to fund capital projects, the City may consider using the cash to reduce the <br />unfunded pension liability, and instead issue tax‐exempt debt to pay for the project. Tax‐exempt debt carries a low <br />interest rate, and this strategy effectively swaps a higher‐rate debt for a lower‐rate debt. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.