My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - #26
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
07/20/2021 Regular
>
Correspondence - #26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2021 3:37:56 PM
Creation date
7/19/2021 4:41:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
7/20/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Flores, Dora <br />From: Tim Johnson <tjohnson@jlkrllp.com> <br />Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 9:06 AM <br />To: eComment, Sarmiento, Vicente; Mendoza, Nelida; Bacerra, Phil; Penaloza, David; <br />Lopez, Jessie; Hernandez, Johnathan; Phan, Thai <br />Cc: Ridge, Kristine; Mendoza, Steven <br />Subject: Agenda Item #26- Cannabis Public Benefit Fund <br />Council... Tonight you will be considering changes to the city's Cannabis Public Benefit Fund (CPBF) to essentially allow a <br />re -distribution from the Enforcement (ENF) portion of the CPBF to the Youth Services (YS) portion ... each of the ENF and <br />YS currently are allocated one third of the cannabis related tax revenue from commercial and retail activities. I ask that <br />before approving this reallocation that you consider what activities the ENF portion of the CPBF can be utilized <br />for. There is no doubt that providing youth services are of vital importance. However, I believe that many in our <br />community believe that the ENF portion is essentially only allowing for SAPID funding and do not understand what is <br />currently allowed to be funded from the ENF fund. It is a balancing act of providing for the many needs of our <br />community, but ENF funds are NOT reserved for policing... there are many allowed uses for the ENF fund that would fall <br />outside of police funding. <br />I believe that funds currently in ENF and those that will continue to come in the future can be utilized for the following <br />vital needs of our community because they fall under the very broad definition (likely purposefully broad IMO) of <br />enforcement services as outlined in the original ordinance: <br />• Code Enforcement: Prior to the pandemic, the city was slated to hire additional code enforcement officers which <br />never happened. Our city appears to be still under staffed in this area especially when compared to staffing <br />before the great recession. We have still not hit those expanded levels of service despite possibly having even <br />greater needs. I believe that utilizing the ENF fund for additional hiring here may be a good utilization of these <br />funds and allowed under the ordinance since they are enforcing city code. <br />• Graffiti Removal: Our graffiti removal team does a great job when they are told of an area on the city's <br />app. However, they are reactionary. I am told that there first responsibility is to respond to report on the <br />app. There are areas that I know do not get reported and the graffiti will stay for days. It is very possible that by <br />expanding this service to allow for one or two more trucks to remove graffiti, they can be more proactive and <br />make our city look better and get ahead of graffiti before it is seen by many. Since it is illegal to graffiti our city, <br />it seems that expanding this program would be an allowable use of the ENF funds. <br />• Trash Pickup: There is trash in our city. On sidewalks, on bike trails, on walking trails, in parking lots, along <br />streets, next to garbage cans. Our city workers/contractors do a good job of responding when an item is <br />brought to their attention via the city's app, but like the graffiti removal, they appear to be reactionary and are <br />absorbed with responding instead of seeking out hotspots in the city. I find that hotspots are often not reported <br />b/c residents may start to become blind to the problem because it simply keeps happening over and over again <br />and they essentially just give up. Since it is illegal to litter in our city, this would appear to be an allowed use of <br />these ENF funds. <br />• Parking Solutions: No doubt parking is an issue in our city. Parking often rolls into violations of city ordinances <br />and code. I believe that development of some parking solutions would also be an allowed use of ENF funds if it <br />is to help in bringing areas into compliance or relieve parking problems in certain neighborhoods. <br />• Abandoned or Dilapidated Buildings/Parking Lots: We have certain buildings and vacant lots that need some <br />love from the owners. The city needs resources to encourage the owners to take care of their property to come <br />in compliance with city code and also to simply make corrections to some parcels. The city can develop a <br />program funded by ENF funds to help bring areas of disrepair up to city standards which will help our <br />community. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.