My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Non-Agenda
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
07/20/2021 Regular
>
Correspondence - Non-Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2021 3:19:35 PM
Creation date
7/19/2021 4:43:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
7/20/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OCAC is stating TNR goes against California Penal Code, 597s, which is does not as seen by all <br />other neighboring Counties within California that have been performing TNR and continuing to do so. <br />OCAC is stating it is a financial burden, although funding has been allocated for TNR in our OC <br />Community Resources budget long before they moved to their new $35 million dollar facility. And <br />standard economics justify spaying one cat is more cost effective than caring for the cat, her kittens, <br />and all other kittens that continue to multiply. <br /> <br />---------- Forwarded message --------- <br />From: No Kill Advocacy Center <info@nokilladvocacycenter.org> <br />Date: Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 7:13 AM <br />Subject: TNR/RTF is Legal in California <br />To: <Andi.Bernard@occr.ocgov.com>, <Monica.Schmidt@occr.ocgov.com> <br />Cc: <Dylan.Wright@occr.ocgov.com>, <Cymantha.Atkinson@occr.ocgov.com>, <br /><Lisa.Bartlett@ocgov.com>, <donald.wagner@ocgov.com>, <doug.chaffee@ocgov.com>, <br /><Andrew.Do@ocgov.com>, <Katrina.Foley@ocgov.com> <br /> <br />Andi Bernard <br />Director, Orange County Animal Care <br />1630 Victory Rd. <br />Tustin, CA 92782 <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Bernard, <br /> <br />We are writing in response to an email sent to volunteers and rescuers that Orange County Animal <br />Care has discontinued its community cat sterilization (i.e., TNR/RTF) because of the belief that it is <br />illegal in California; namely, that it violates the cruelty law against abandonment. It does not. <br /> <br />California's Food & Ag Code Sec. 31105 mandates that counties shall provide for "The taking up and <br />impounding of all dogs which are found running at large..." but there is no parallel provision for <br />rounding up healthy community cats and agencies are not compelled by law to do so. CA Pen. Code <br />Sec. 597.1 (c) (1) only requires cats to be taken in if they are injured and, even then, the statute <br />mandates that they be taken to a veterinarian for "proper care and \[to be\] given emergency <br />treatment." And given that custody of cats through trapping is only done while contemplating the cat's <br />re-release, if the cats are healthy, re-releasing the cats as part of a community cat sterilization <br />program lacks the kind of general or specific intent that the animal cruelty laws require. <br /> <br />As prosecutors across the state and country have noted, the abandonment statute is, <br /> <br /> <br />\[D\]irected at those people who dump their pets and those individuals who move from an area and <br />leave their pets behind. If an animal is returned to the area where it is being fed, it would be a greater <br />injustice to find that these animals had been abandoned so that no action to spay/neuter the animals <br />would be taken by anyone. <br /> <br />The reasons for this are obvious. First, community cat sterilization improves, rather than threatens, <br />the health and safety of cats. This includes providing a physical exam, vaccination(s), and other <br />medical services to improve the quality and longevity of their lives. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.