My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - #1
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
07/26/2021 Special Work Study
>
Correspondence - #1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2021 4:07:00 PM
Creation date
7/26/2021 11:33:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
1
Date
7/26/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />2. Construction costs are significantly understated. <br /> <br />Ώ One BIA member is currently developing three affordable housing rental projects with <br />significantly higher construction costs -rate prototype projects. <br /> <br />o Avg. construction costs: $317/gsf$43/gsf HIGHER-rate prototype <br />project <br /> <br />o Avg. TDC: $521/gsf $120/gsf HIGHER -rate prototype project <br /> <br />Ώ New ground-up market-rate projects will require much higher hard costs when compared to <br /> example affordable projects in order to achieve the rent premiums garnered by 4-star (and <br /> <br /> <br />o d costs are significantly understated. <br /> <br />Ώ Furthermore, due to the spike in construction costs, the cost estimates that <br />receiving today are significantly higher than those received from contractors 6-12 months ago. <br /> <br />3. Parking costs are potentially/likely understated. <br /> <br />Ώ <br />parking code. <br /> <br />Ώ <br />surface, below-grade. <br /> <br />Ώ Givconservative parking requirements, parking is a significant driver of hard costs. <br /> <br />Ώ <br />. <br /> <br />4. Efficiency factor is overstated <br /> <br />Ώ KMA assumed an efficiency factor (NRSF / Gross Building Area) of 85%, which is too high and <br />not realistically achievable. <br /> <br />Ώ An efficiency factor of 75-80% is more appropriate. <br /> <br />Ώ s well as the <br />supportable in-lieu fee. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.